↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO022-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:19:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.53s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  12   ~;  10   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn  22   !;   0   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    equidistant(u,v,w,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) ).

fof(f20,axiom,
    equidistant(w,x,y,z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_to_x_equals_y_to_z) ).

fof(f21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(u,v,y,z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_transitivity) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_88,plain,
    equidistant(u,v,w,x),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_89,plain,
    equidistant(w,x,y,z),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(u,v,y,z),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

tcf(c_630,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equidistant(w,x,X0,X1)
      | ~ equidistant(u,v,X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_679,plain,
    equidistant(w,x,v,u),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_630]) ).

tcf(c_681,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equidistant(v,u,X0,X1)
      | ~ equidistant(w,x,X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_679,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_722,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equidistant(u,v,y,z)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,y,z)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,u,v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_71]) ).

tcf(c_791,plain,
    ( equidistant(u,v,y,z)
    | ~ equidistant(v,u,y,z)
    | ~ equidistant(v,u,u,v) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_722]) ).

tcf(c_792,plain,
    equidistant(v,u,u,v),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_70]) ).

tcf(c_1620,plain,
    equidistant(v,u,y,z),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_681]) ).

tcf(c_1638,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1620,c_792,c_791,c_90]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO022-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 10:26:06 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.40  
% 0.08/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.08/0.40  
% 0.08/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.08/0.42  % Proving...
% 2.53/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.53/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.53/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.53/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % 
% 2.53/1.26  % clauses                               21
% 2.53/1.26  % conjectures                           1
% 2.53/1.26  % EPR                                   12
% 2.53/1.26  % Horn                                  16
% 2.53/1.26  % unary                                 9
% 2.53/1.26  % binary                                2
% 2.53/1.26  % lits                                  59
% 2.53/1.26  % lits eq                               7
% 2.53/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.53/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.53/1.26  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.53/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 2.53/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ 
% 2.53/1.26  % Current options:
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 2.53/1.26  % 
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.53/1.26  
% 2.53/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------