↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GEO026-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:07:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.89s 3.11s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO026-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:34:38 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___211_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.13/0.36  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.13/0.36  #
% 0.13/0.36  # Number of axioms: 23 Number of unprocessed: 23
% 0.13/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 2.27/2.53  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 2.27/2.53  # Local unification is enabled...
% 2.27/2.53  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 2.27/2.53  # 23 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 2.27/2.53  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 2.27/2.53  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 2.27/2.53  # Found 11 unit axioms.
% 2.27/2.53  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 2.27/2.53  # 12 extension rule candidate clauses
% 2.27/2.53  # 11 unit axiom clauses
% 2.27/2.53  
% 2.27/2.53  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 2.27/2.53  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 2.89/3.11  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 2.89/3.11  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/3.11  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.89/3.11  # Begin clausification derivation
% 2.89/3.11  
% 2.89/3.11  # End clausification derivation
% 2.89/3.11  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_45, hypothesis, (u!=v)).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (x!=w)).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_42, hypothesis, (between(u,v,w))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_43, hypothesis, (between(u,v,x))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (X1=X2|~between(X1,X2,X1))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_44, hypothesis, (equidistant(v,w,v,x))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X1=X2|~equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X2=X3|between(X5,X1,X4)|between(X4,X5,X1)|between(X1,X4,X5)|~equidistant(X5,X2,X5,X3)|~equidistant(X4,X2,X4,X3)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (X1=X2|equidistant(X5,X7,X6,X8)|~between(X3,X4,X6)|~between(X1,X2,X5)|~equidistant(X2,X7,X4,X8)|~equidistant(X2,X5,X4,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X7,X3,X8)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1)|~between(X4,X5,X3)|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4)|~between(X4,X5,X3)|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X5,euclid2(X1,X4,X2,X5,X3))|~between(X4,X2,X5)|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X4,euclid1(X1,X4,X2,X5,X3))|~between(X4,X2,X5)|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=X2|between(euclid1(X1,X4,X2,X5,X3),X3,euclid2(X1,X4,X2,X5,X3))|~between(X4,X2,X5)|~between(X1,X2,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (between(X3,continuous(X1,X2,X3,X6,X4,X5),X5)|~between(X2,X6,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X4)|~equidistant(X1,X4,X1,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (equidistant(X1,X6,X1,continuous(X1,X2,X3,X6,X4,X5))|~between(X2,X6,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X4)|~equidistant(X1,X4,X1,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X3))).
% 2.89/3.11  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 2.89/3.11  # Begin printing tableau
% 2.89/3.11  # Found 7 steps
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (x!=w), inference(start_rule)).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (x!=w), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_39])).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (~between(X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (~between(x,w,extension(x,w,X20,X21))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_85, plain, (between(euclid1(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)),extension(x,w,X20,X21),euclid2(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_121, plain, (~between(euclid1(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)),extension(x,w,X20,X21),euclid2(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_85])).
% 2.89/3.11  cnf(i_0_120, plain, (between(extension(x,w,X20,X21),inner_pasch(euclid1(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)),extension(x,w,X20,X21),euclid2(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)),extension(x,w,X20,X21),euclid1(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21))),euclid1(x,X22,w,extension(X22,w,X18,X19),extension(x,w,X20,X21)))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_120, ...])).
% 2.89/3.11  # End printing tableau
% 2.89/3.11  # SZS output end
% 2.89/3.11  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 2.89/3.11  # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 2.89/3.11  # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
% 2.89/3.11  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 2.89/3.11  # Proof search is over...
% 2.89/3.11  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------