%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GEO029-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rGTqWUBgKJ true
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:33:39 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 162.69s 35.74s
% Output : Refutation 162.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.14 % Problem : GEO029-3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.15 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rGTqWUBgKJ true
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 17:38:38 EDT 2025
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.11/0.38 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.11/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.11/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.18/0.59 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.18/0.59 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.18/0.59 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.85/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.85/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.85/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.85/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.85/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.85/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.85/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.85/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_lcnf.sh running for 50s
% 162.69/35.74 % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 162.69/35.74 % done 8028 iterations in 34.930s
% 162.69/35.74 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 162.69/35.74 % SZS output start Refutation
% 162.69/35.74 thf(between_type, type, between: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(reflection_type, type, reflection: $i > $i > $i).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(v_type, type, v: $i).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(equidistant_type, type, equidistant: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(extension_type, type, extension: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(segment_construction1, axiom,
% 162.69/35.74 (between @ X @ Y @ ( extension @ X @ Y @ W @ V ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (between @ X0 @ X1 @ (extension @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [segment_construction1])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(r2_1, axiom, (between @ U @ V @ ( reflection @ U @ V ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (between @ X0 @ X1 @ (reflection @ X0 @ X1))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [r2_1])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(r2_2, axiom, (equidistant @ V @ ( reflection @ U @ V ) @ U @ V)).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (equidistant @ X0 @ (reflection @ X1 @ X0) @ X1 @ X0)),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [r2_2])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(d4_4, axiom,
% 162.69/35.74 (( ~( equidistant @ U @ V @ W @ X ) ) | ( equidistant @ X @ W @ U @ V ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (~ (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)
% 162.69/35.74 | (equidistant @ X3 @ X2 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [d4_4])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl106, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X0 @ (reflection @ X1 @ X0))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl31, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(segment_construction2, axiom,
% 162.69/35.74 (equidistant @ Y @ ( extension @ X @ Y @ W @ V ) @ W @ V)).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (equidistant @ X0 @ (extension @ X1 @ X0 @ X2 @ X3) @ X2 @ X3)),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [segment_construction2])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(d5, axiom,
% 162.69/35.74 (( ~( equidistant @ U @ V @ W @ X ) ) |
% 162.69/35.74 ( ~( equidistant @ W @ X @ Y @ Z ) ) | ( equidistant @ U @ V @ Y @ Z ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (~ (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)
% 162.69/35.74 | ~ (equidistant @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)
% 162.69/35.74 | (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X4 @ X5))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [d5])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 ( (equidistant @ X2 @ (extension @ X3 @ X2 @ X1 @ X0) @ X5 @ X4)
% 162.69/35.74 | ~ (equidistant @ X1 @ X0 @ X5 @ X4))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl558, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (equidistant @ X2 @ (extension @ X3 @ X2 @ X0 @ X1) @ X0 @
% 162.69/35.74 (reflection @ X1 @ X0))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl106, zip_derived_cl119])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(d9, axiom,
% 162.69/35.74 (( ~( between @ U @ V @ W ) ) | ( ~( between @ U @ V @ X ) ) |
% 162.69/35.74 ( ~( equidistant @ V @ W @ V @ X ) ) | ( ( U ) = ( V ) ) |
% 162.69/35.74 ( ( W ) = ( X ) ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl37, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (~ (between @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 162.69/35.74 | ~ (between @ X0 @ X1 @ X3)
% 162.69/35.74 | ~ (equidistant @ X1 @ X2 @ X1 @ X3)
% 162.69/35.74 | ((X0) = (X1))
% 162.69/35.74 | ((X2) = (X3)))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [d9])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl5324, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (((extension @ X2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) = (reflection @ X1 @ X0))
% 162.69/35.74 | ((X3) = (X0))
% 162.69/35.74 | ~ (between @ X3 @ X0 @ (reflection @ X1 @ X0))
% 162.69/35.74 | ~ (between @ X3 @ X0 @ (extension @ X2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl558, zip_derived_cl37])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl94865, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (~ (between @ X1 @ X0 @ (extension @ X2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1))
% 162.69/35.74 | ((X1) = (X0))
% 162.69/35.74 | ((extension @ X2 @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) = (reflection @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl30, zip_derived_cl5324])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl94872, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 (((extension @ X0 @ X1 @ X1 @ X0) = (reflection @ X0 @ X1))
% 162.69/35.74 | ((X0) = (X1)))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl94865])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(prove_equal_extensions, conjecture,
% 162.69/35.74 (( extension @ u @ v @ u @ v ) = ( extension @ u @ v @ v @ u ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 162.69/35.74 (( extension @ u @ v @ u @ v ) != ( extension @ u @ v @ v @ u )),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_equal_extensions])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl39, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (((extension @ u @ v @ u @ v) != (extension @ u @ v @ v @ u))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(reflection, axiom,
% 162.69/35.74 (( reflection @ U @ V ) = ( extension @ U @ V @ U @ V ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 162.69/35.74 ((reflection @ X0 @ X1) = (extension @ X0 @ X1 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [reflection])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl111, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 (((reflection @ u @ v) != (extension @ u @ v @ v @ u))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl39, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl95390, plain,
% 162.69/35.74 ((((reflection @ u @ v) != (reflection @ u @ v)) | ((u) = (v)))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl94872, zip_derived_cl111])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl95451, plain, (((u) = (v))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl95390])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(u_not_v, axiom, (( u ) != ( v ))).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl38, plain, (((u) != (v))),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [u_not_v])).
% 162.69/35.74 thf(zip_derived_cl95452, plain, ($false),
% 162.69/35.74 inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 162.69/35.74 [zip_derived_cl95451, zip_derived_cl38])).
% 162.69/35.74
% 162.69/35.74 % SZS output end Refutation
% 162.69/35.74
% 162.69/35.74
% 162.69/35.74 % Terminating...
% 162.69/35.93 % Runner terminated.
% 162.69/35.95 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------