%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO036-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.94s 2.15s
% Output : Refutation 1.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO036-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:20:58 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.36 Sat Jun 18 01:20:58 2022
% 0.19/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3075.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,A,C)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,C,B)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36 64 back subsumes 61.
% 0.19/0.36 69 back subsumes 56.
% 0.19/0.36 69 back subsumes 43.
% 0.19/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [copy,74,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.36 74 back subsumes 59.
% 0.19/0.36 74 back subsumes 58.
% 0.19/0.36 74 back subsumes 57.
% 0.19/0.36 75 back subsumes 44.
% 0.19/0.36 82 back subsumes 60.
% 0.19/0.36 82 back subsumes 48.
% 0.19/0.36 82 back subsumes 47.
% 0.19/0.36 83 back subsumes 49.
% 0.19/0.36
% 0.19/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.99 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.99 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.99 number of clauses in intial UL: 47
% 0.76/0.99 number of clauses initially in problem: 65
% 0.76/0.99 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 72
% 0.76/0.99 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 0.76/0.99 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.76/0.99 absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.76/0.99 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.76/0.99 distinct function count: 6
% 0.76/0.99 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.76/0.99
% 0.76/0.99 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.94/2.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.94/2.15 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Model 5 [ 36 39 172130 ] (0.00 seconds, 179113 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.76 sec ----> 307 [binary,306.1,83.1] {-} $F.
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Length of proof is 5. Level of proof is 5.
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.94/2.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.94/2.15 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 8 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1).
% 1.94/2.15 9 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2).
% 1.94/2.15 82 [] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 1.94/2.15 83 [] {+} between(A,A,B).
% 1.94/2.15 84 [] {-} lower_dimension_point_1=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_3|lower_dimension_point_1=lower_dimension_point_3.
% 1.94/2.15 85 [copy,84,flip.1,flip.2,flip.3] {-} lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_1|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 1.94/2.15 236 [para_from,85.1.1,9.1.3,unit_del,82] {-} lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 1.94/2.15 303,302 [para_from,236.1.1,8.1.2,unit_del,83] {-} lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 1.94/2.15 305,304 [para_from,236.2.1,9.1.1,demod,303,unit_del,83,flip.1] {-} lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 1.94/2.15 306 [back_demod,9,demod,303,305] {-} -between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1).
% 1.94/2.15 307 [binary,306.1,83.1] {-} $F.
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.94/2.15 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 ============ end of search ============
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 true clauses given 3 (30.0%)
% 1.94/2.15 false clauses given 7
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 FALSE TRUE
% 1.94/2.15 4 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 5 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 6 2 0
% 1.94/2.15 7 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 8 0 2
% 1.94/2.15 9 7 2
% 1.94/2.15 10 1 2
% 1.94/2.15 11 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 12 0 3
% 1.94/2.15 13 1 2
% 1.94/2.15 14 1 3
% 1.94/2.15 15 1 4
% 1.94/2.15 16 0 6
% 1.94/2.15 17 2 4
% 1.94/2.15 18 0 2
% 1.94/2.15 19 0 4
% 1.94/2.15 20 0 7
% 1.94/2.15 21 3 3
% 1.94/2.15 22 1 1
% 1.94/2.15 23 0 3
% 1.94/2.15 24 1 2
% 1.94/2.15 25 1 2
% 1.94/2.15 27 1 0
% 1.94/2.15 28 0 4
% 1.94/2.15 29 4 1
% 1.94/2.15 30 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 31 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 33 0 3
% 1.94/2.15 34 3 0
% 1.94/2.15 35 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 36 1 1
% 1.94/2.15 37 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 38 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 39 1 1
% 1.94/2.15 42 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 43 1 1
% 1.94/2.15 44 1 0
% 1.94/2.15 45 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 49 0 1
% 1.94/2.15 50 1 0
% 1.94/2.15 tot: 34 75 (68.8% true)
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Model 5 [ 36 39 172130 ] (0.00 seconds, 179113 Inserts)
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.94/2.15
% 1.94/2.15 Process 3075 finished Sat Jun 18 01:20:59 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------