↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO037-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:19:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.55s 6.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  25 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  19   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   63 (   0 sgn  63   !;   0   ?;  44   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
      ( equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_equidistance) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : between(X0,X1,extension(X0,X1,X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction1) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : equidistant(X0,extension(X1,X0,X2,X3),X2,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction2) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension3) ).

fof(f19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ between(u,v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))
    | ~ equidistant(v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),x,extension(w,x,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))
    | v = extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_lengthen) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_70,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_71,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : between(X0,X1,extension(X0,X1,X2,X3)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_72,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : equidistant(X0,extension(X1,X0,X2,X3),X2,X3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_79,plain,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2) = v )
    | ~ between(u,v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))
    | ~ equidistant(v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),x,extension(w,x,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    ( ( extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2) = v )
    | ~ equidistant(v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),x,extension(w,x,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)) ),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_86,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_321,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_322,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = extension(w,x,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_323,plain,
    ( ( iPr_def_10 = v )
    | ~ equidistant(v,iPr_def_10,x,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_322,c_321]) ).

tcf(c_659,plain,
    equidistant(v,iPr_def_10,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_72]) ).

tcf(c_670,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : extension(X0,X1,X2,X2) = X1,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_678,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( equidistant(X1,X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_679,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
      ( equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5)
      | ~ equidistant(X0,extension(X1,X0,X2,X3),X4,X5) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_684,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equidistant(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,X0,X1)
      | ~ equidistant(v,iPr_def_10,X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_659,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_692,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : between(X0,X1,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_670,c_71]) ).

tcf(c_704,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : equidistant(X0,X1,X0,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_678]) ).

tcf(c_735,plain,
    equidistant(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,iPr_def_10,v),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_684]) ).

tcf(c_744,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] : equidistant(X0,X1,X2,extension(X3,X2,X0,X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_704,c_679]) ).

tcf(c_795,plain,
    equidistant(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_1,iPr_def_10,v),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_735,c_678]) ).

tcf(c_796,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equidistant(iPr_def_10,v,X0,X1)
      | ~ equidistant(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_735,c_69]) ).

tcf(c_848,plain,
    equidistant(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,x,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_322,c_744]) ).

tcf(c_1780,plain,
    equidistant(iPr_def_10,v,x,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_848,c_796]) ).

tcf(c_1887,plain,
    equidistant(v,iPr_def_10,x,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1780,c_678]) ).

tcf(c_1899,plain,
    v = iPr_def_10,
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_323,c_1887]) ).

tcf(c_1913,plain,
    equidistant(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_1,iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_795,c_1899]) ).

tcf(c_1951,plain,
    lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1913,c_70]) ).

tcf(c_1976,plain,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_79,c_1951]) ).

tcf(c_1979,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1976,c_692]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO037-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 10:30:33 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.43  % Proving...
% 3.55/6.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.55/6.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.55/6.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % 
% 3.55/6.28  % clauses                               21
% 3.55/6.28  % conjectures                           0
% 3.55/6.28  % EPR                                   10
% 3.55/6.28  % Horn                                  16
% 3.55/6.28  % unary                                 8
% 3.55/6.28  % binary                                3
% 3.55/6.28  % lits                                  60
% 3.55/6.28  % lits eq                               10
% 3.55/6.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.55/6.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.55/6.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.55/6.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 3.55/6.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ 
% 3.55/6.28  % Current options:
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % ------ Proving...
% 3.55/6.28  % 
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.55/6.28  
% 3.55/6.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------