↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO041-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 34.95s 35.16s
% Output   : Refutation 34.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GEO041-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 12:36:59 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34  The process was started by sandbox2 on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34  Sat Jun 18 12:36:59 2022
% 0.11/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8086.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.34  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.11/0.34  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.11/0.34  clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34  36 back subsumes 33.
% 0.11/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,41,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.67  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.67  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.67  number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.46/0.67  number of clauses initially in problem: 39
% 0.46/0.67  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.46/0.67  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.46/0.67  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.46/0.67  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.46/0.67     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.46/0.67     distinct function count: 5
% 0.46/0.67     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  =========== start of search ===========
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 3 [ 1 27 96003 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 4 [ 6 44 161202 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 5 [ 5 4 9684 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 6 [ 3 71 235072 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 7 [ 78 3 6572 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 8 [ 56 45 127064 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 9 [ 47 17 77807 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 10 [ 57 60 229030 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 11 [ 65 25 102338 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 12 [ 60 41 165922 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Model 13 [ 60 39 155651 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.54/11.78  
% 11.54/11.78  Resetting weight limit to 59 after 45 givens.
% 11.54/11.78  
% 30.33/30.52  
% 30.33/30.52  
% 30.33/30.52  Changing weight limit from 59 to 56.
% 30.33/30.52  
% 30.33/30.52  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 30.33/30.52  
% 30.33/30.52  Model 14 [ 38 56 219280 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 30.33/30.52  
% 30.33/30.52  Resetting weight limit to 56 after 80 givens.
% 30.33/30.52  
% 33.03/33.25  
% 33.03/33.25  
% 33.03/33.25  Changing weight limit from 56 to 36.
% 33.03/33.25  
% 33.03/33.25  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 85 givens.
% 33.03/33.25  
% 33.73/33.92  
% 33.73/33.92  
% 33.73/33.92  Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 33.73/33.92  
% 33.73/33.92  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 90 givens.
% 33.73/33.92  
% 34.34/34.53  
% 34.34/34.53  
% 34.34/34.53  Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 34.34/34.53  
% 34.34/34.53  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 95 givens.
% 34.34/34.53  
% 34.83/35.01  
% 34.83/35.01  
% 34.83/35.01  Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 34.83/35.01  
% 34.83/35.01  Resetting weight limit to 33 after 100 givens.
% 34.83/35.01  
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  -- HEY sandbox2, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  34.76 sec ----> 9829 [binary,9827.1,17.1] {+} $F.
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  Length of proof is 16.  Level of proof is 9.
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 34.95/35.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 34.95/35.16  % SZS output start Refutation
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 34.95/35.16  4 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|A=B.
% 34.95/35.16  5 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(B,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),D).
% 34.95/35.16  6 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(E,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),A).
% 34.95/35.16  16 [] {-} v!=w.
% 34.95/35.16  17 [copy,16,flip.1] {+} w!=v.
% 34.95/35.16  37 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 34.95/35.16  38 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 34.95/35.16  39 [] {+} between(u,v,w).
% 34.95/35.16  40 [] {+} between(u,w,v).
% 34.95/35.16  483,482 [hyper,38,2,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 34.95/35.16  820 [para_into,482.1.1,4.2.1,demod,483,483] {+} A=B| -between(B,A,B).
% 34.95/35.16  824 [para_from,482.1.1,37.1.3] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 34.95/35.16  872 [hyper,824,6,39] {-} between(w,inner_pasch(u,v,w,w,A),u).
% 34.95/35.16  874 [hyper,824,6,40] {-} between(w,inner_pasch(A,v,v,w,u),A).
% 34.95/35.16  879 [hyper,824,5,39] {-} between(v,inner_pasch(u,v,w,w,A),A).
% 34.95/35.16  3275 [hyper,879,820] {-} inner_pasch(u,v,w,w,v)=v.
% 34.95/35.16  3536 [para_from,3275.1.1,872.1.2] {+} between(w,v,u).
% 34.95/35.16  5290 [hyper,874,820] {-} inner_pasch(w,v,v,w,u)=w.
% 34.95/35.16  5560 [para_from,5290.1.1,5.3.2,unit_del,824,40] {+} between(v,w,u).
% 34.95/35.16  5629 [hyper,5560,6,3536] {+} between(w,inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,v),w).
% 34.95/35.16  5645 [hyper,5560,5,3536] {-} between(v,inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,v),v).
% 34.95/35.16  9820,9819 [hyper,5645,820] {-} inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,v)=v.
% 34.95/35.16  9824 [back_demod,5629,demod,9820] {-} between(w,v,w).
% 34.95/35.16  9827 [hyper,9824,820,flip.1] {-} w=v.
% 34.95/35.16  9829 [binary,9827.1,17.1] {+} $F.
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  % SZS output end Refutation
% 34.95/35.16  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  ============ end of search ============
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  true clauses given          23      (22.3%)
% 34.95/35.16  false clauses given         80
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16        FALSE     TRUE
% 34.95/35.16     8  1         41
% 34.95/35.16     9  2         75
% 34.95/35.16    10  1         10
% 34.95/35.16    11  12        5
% 34.95/35.16    12  105       103
% 34.95/35.16    13  270       195
% 34.95/35.16    14  227       122
% 34.95/35.16    15  8         21
% 34.95/35.16    16  13        40
% 34.95/35.16    17  30        183
% 34.95/35.16    18  19        112
% 34.95/35.16    19  50        52
% 34.95/35.16    20  14        16
% 34.95/35.16    21  144       365
% 34.95/35.16    22  204       260
% 34.95/35.16    23  37        161
% 34.95/35.16    24  139       108
% 34.95/35.16    25  180       168
% 34.95/35.16    26  324       219
% 34.95/35.16    27  242       217
% 34.95/35.16    28  124       27
% 34.95/35.16    29  30        1
% 34.95/35.16    30  106       6
% 34.95/35.16    31  180       0
% 34.95/35.16    32  60        4
% 34.95/35.16    33  20        3
% 34.95/35.16  tot:  2542      2514      (49.7% true)
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  Model 14 [ 38 -1636 219280 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 34.95/35.16  
% 34.95/35.16  Process 8086 finished Sat Jun 18 12:37:34 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------