%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO042-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:26:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 55 ( 8 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 76 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_betweeness) ).
cnf(inner_pasch2,axiom,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',inner_pasch2) ).
cnf(inner_pasch1,axiom,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',inner_pasch1) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
between(u,v,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(w_between_v_and_x,hypothesis,
between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_between_v_and_x) ).
cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction2) ).
cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction1) ).
cnf(prove_v_between_u_and_w,negated_conjecture,
~ between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_betweeness]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_pasch2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_pasch1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X4,X1,X3)
| inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X1,X4) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ between(X2,X1,X4)
| ~ between(X3,X2,X4)
| between(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
between(u,v,x),
v_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_equidistance]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
( ~ between(v,X1,x)
| between(X1,v,u) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
between(v,w,x),
w_between_v_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
segment_construction2 ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
between(w,v,u),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
segment_construction1 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
extension(X1,X2,X3,X3) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ between(u,v,w),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_v_between_u_and_w]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
( ~ between(v,X1,u)
| between(X1,v,w) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
between(X1,X2,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ between(u,v,w),
c_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO042-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 08:35:27 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3250280 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.42 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3250286 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.42 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.13/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Initial clauses : 21
% 0.13/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.13/0.42 % Processed clauses : 73
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 72
% 0.13/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.13/0.42 % Generated clauses : 155
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 132
% 0.13/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Paramodulations : 155
% 0.13/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 24
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of those cached : 6
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 49
% 0.13/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.13/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.13/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 99
% 0.13/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 366
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 23
% 0.13/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 306
% 0.13/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 173
% 0.13/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57
% 0.13/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 115
% 0.13/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.13/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3034
% 0.13/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 75
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.42 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3656 pages
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.13/0.42 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------