↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO042-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.21s 6.46s
% Output   : Refutation 6.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO042-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 11:59:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n016.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Sat Jun 18 11:59:52 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 31596.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,A,C)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,C,B)|A=B|B=C.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [demod,63] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [demod,63] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  59 back subsumes 56.
% 0.12/0.35  64 back subsumes 52.
% 0.12/0.35  64 back subsumes 39.
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [copy,69,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  69 back subsumes 55.
% 0.12/0.35  69 back subsumes 54.
% 0.12/0.35  69 back subsumes 53.
% 0.12/0.35  70 back subsumes 40.
% 0.12/0.35  77 back subsumes 44.
% 0.12/0.35  77 back subsumes 43.
% 0.12/0.35  78 back subsumes 45.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.82/1.01  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.82/1.01  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.82/1.01  number of clauses in intial UL: 43
% 0.82/1.01  number of clauses initially in problem: 62
% 0.82/1.01  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 69
% 0.82/1.01  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.82/1.01  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.82/1.01  absolute distinct symbol count: 16
% 0.82/1.01     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.82/1.01     distinct function count: 6
% 0.82/1.01     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  =========== start of search ===========
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 6.21/6.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.21/6.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 4 [ 1 33 123683 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 5 [ 3 23 88105 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 6 [ 4 28 102498 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 7 [ 2 26 105125 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 8 [ 2 32 116502 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 9 [ 44 28 104447 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 10 [ 42 26 111029 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 11 [ 50 28 116968 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   6.08 sec ----> 1931 [binary,1930.1,38.1] {+} $F.
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.21/6.46  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.21/6.46  % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  4 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|A=B.
% 6.21/6.46  5 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(B,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),D).
% 6.21/6.46  6 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(E,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),A).
% 6.21/6.46  35 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)|between(C,B,A).
% 6.21/6.46  38 [] {+} -between(u,v,w).
% 6.21/6.46  65 [] {-} A=extension(B,A,C,C).
% 6.21/6.46  67,66 [copy,65,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 6.21/6.46  79 [] {+} between(u,v,x).
% 6.21/6.46  80 [] {+} between(v,w,x).
% 6.21/6.46  146 [hyper,80,6,79] {-} between(v,inner_pasch(v,w,x,v,u),v).
% 6.21/6.46  148 [hyper,80,5,79] {+} between(w,inner_pasch(v,w,x,v,u),u).
% 6.21/6.46  525 [para_into,66.1.1,4.2.1,demod,67,67] {+} A=B| -between(B,A,B).
% 6.21/6.46  1925,1924 [hyper,146,525] {-} inner_pasch(v,w,x,v,u)=v.
% 6.21/6.46  1926 [back_demod,148,demod,1925] {-} between(w,v,u).
% 6.21/6.46  1930 [hyper,1926,35] {-} between(u,v,w).
% 6.21/6.46  1931 [binary,1930.1,38.1] {+} $F.
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.21/6.46  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  ============ end of search ============
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  true clauses given           5      (15.2%)
% 6.21/6.46  false clauses given         28
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46        FALSE     TRUE
% 6.21/6.46     6  0         1
% 6.21/6.46     8  1         35
% 6.21/6.46     9  36        38
% 6.21/6.46    10  6         15
% 6.21/6.46    11  26        14
% 6.21/6.46    12  88        41
% 6.21/6.46    13  62        13
% 6.21/6.46    14  15        6
% 6.21/6.46    15  52        9
% 6.21/6.46    16  97        19
% 6.21/6.46    17  44        35
% 6.21/6.46    18  3         9
% 6.21/6.46    19  51        9
% 6.21/6.46    20  30        30
% 6.21/6.46    21  62        50
% 6.21/6.46    22  19        29
% 6.21/6.46    23  11        10
% 6.21/6.46    24  127       7
% 6.21/6.46    25  112       9
% 6.21/6.46    26  50        37
% 6.21/6.46    27  55        19
% 6.21/6.46    28  9         3
% 6.21/6.46    29  8         6
% 6.21/6.46    30  54        4
% 6.21/6.46    31  18        50
% 6.21/6.46    32  6         2
% 6.21/6.46    33  3         11
% 6.21/6.46    34  4         0
% 6.21/6.46    35  51        4
% 6.21/6.46    36  10        1
% 6.21/6.46    37  10        50
% 6.21/6.46    38  1         1
% 6.21/6.46    39  2         1
% 6.21/6.46    40  8         1
% 6.21/6.46    41  44        0
% 6.21/6.46    42  14        1
% 6.21/6.46    43  1         1
% 6.21/6.46    44  2         1
% 6.21/6.46    45  3         2
% 6.21/6.46    46  2         0
% 6.21/6.46    47  3         0
% 6.21/6.46    48  0         4
% 6.21/6.46    49  2         1
% 6.21/6.46    50  4         0
% 6.21/6.46    51  1         1
% 6.21/6.46    52  8         0
% 6.21/6.46    56  2         0
% 6.21/6.46    59  1         0
% 6.21/6.46  tot:  1218      580      (32.3% true)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Model 11 [ 50 -39 116968 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.21/6.46  
% 6.21/6.46  Process 31596 finished Sat Jun 18 11:59:58 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------