↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GEO043-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:26:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.09s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  19 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (  14 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (   8 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
    ( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_betweeness) ).

cnf(inner_pasch2,axiom,
    ( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',inner_pasch2) ).

cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction2) ).

cnf(w_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
    between(u,w,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_between_u_and_x) ).

cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
    between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',segment_construction1) ).

cnf(inner_pasch1,axiom,
    ( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',inner_pasch1) ).

cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
    between(u,v,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).

cnf(prove_w_between_v_and_x,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v,w,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_w_between_v_and_x) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_betweeness]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_pasch2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    segment_construction2 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between(X4,X1,X3)
    | inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X1,X4) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    between(u,w,x),
    w_between_u_and_x ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
    segment_construction1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    extension(X1,X2,X3,X3) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_pasch1]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( ~ between(w,X1,x)
    | inner_pasch(w,X1,x,w,u) = w ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    between(X1,X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    between(u,v,w),
    v_between_u_and_w ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    inner_pasch(w,x,x,w,u) = w,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( ~ between(v,X1,w)
    | inner_pasch(v,X1,w,v,u) = v ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    between(x,w,u),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_17]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    inner_pasch(v,w,w,v,u) = v,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ( ~ between(w,X1,u)
    | inner_pasch(w,X1,u,w,x) = w ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    between(w,v,u),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]),c_0_23]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v,w,x),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_w_between_v_and_x]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,x) = w,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ between(v,w,x),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_32]),c_0_27]),c_0_30])]),c_0_33]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO043-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 08:36:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 805154 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.43  % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with pid 805162 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Result found by 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.43  % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting H----_047_B31_F1_PI_AE_R4_CS_SP_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_SOS_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4c with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Starting 208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.09/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 21
% 0.09/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 21
% 0.09/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
% 0.09/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 71
% 0.09/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.09/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 70
% 0.09/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 103
% 0.09/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 73
% 0.09/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 103
% 0.09/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 71
% 0.09/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 47
% 0.09/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 49
% 0.09/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 0.09/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.09/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 22
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 44
% 0.09/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 164
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.09/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 268
% 0.09/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 133
% 0.09/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.09/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 0.09/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 108
% 0.09/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2028
% 0.09/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 75
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.43  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.43  % System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3592 pages
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.43  % User time                : 0.022 s
% 0.09/0.43  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Total time               : 0.035 s
% 0.09/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------