%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO043-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:26:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 26 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 26 RR)
% Number of literals : 46 ( 4 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 49 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(t1,axiom,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X3,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1) ).
cnf(inner_pasch2,axiom,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',inner_pasch2) ).
cnf(w_between_u_and_x,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',w_between_u_and_x) ).
cnf(v_between_u_and_w,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_between_u_and_w) ).
cnf(inner_pasch1,axiom,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',inner_pasch1) ).
cnf(identity_for_betweeness,axiom,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_betweeness) ).
cnf(prove_w_between_v_and_x,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_w_between_v_and_x) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X3,X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_pasch2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X3,X2,X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
between(u,w,x),
w_between_u_and_x ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X5,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
between(x,w,u),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
between(u,v,w),
v_between_u_and_w ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_pasch1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_betweeness]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( ~ between(X1,X2,u)
| between(w,inner_pasch(X1,X2,u,w,x),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
between(w,v,u),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ between(X4,X5,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,inner_pasch(X1,X2,X3,X5,X4),X4) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ between(X1,X2,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
between(w,inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,x),w),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_w_between_v_and_x]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
( ~ between(X2,X1,u)
| between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X1,u,w,x),x) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
inner_pasch(w,v,u,w,x) = w,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ between(v,w,x),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_17]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO043-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 08:36:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 806588 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.46 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 806598 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.46 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.46
% 0.13/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 55
% 0.13/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Initial clauses : 55
% 0.13/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.13/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 53
% 0.13/0.46 % Processed clauses : 347
% 0.13/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 22
% 0.13/0.46 % ...subsumed : 88
% 0.13/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 237
% 0.13/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.13/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.13/0.46 % Generated clauses : 1607
% 0.13/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1262
% 0.13/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Paramodulations : 1602
% 0.13/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.13/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 411
% 0.13/0.46 % ...of those cached : 274
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 182
% 0.13/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 80
% 0.13/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.13/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 98
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 999
% 0.13/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 1998
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 53
% 0.13/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3699
% 0.13/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2994
% 0.13/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 88
% 0.13/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.13/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 322
% 0.13/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.13/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 25264
% 0.13/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 122
% 0.13/0.46
% 0.13/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.46 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.13/0.46 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3368 pages
% 0.13/0.46
% 0.13/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.46 % User time : 0.099 s
% 0.13/0.46 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Total time : 0.112 s
% 0.13/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------