↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO056-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:20:55 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.20s 1.41s
% Output   : Refutation 1.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   24 (  21 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_v_equals_reflection,negated_conjecture,
    v != reflection(u,v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_v_equals_reflection) ).

cnf(symmetry,axiom,
    ( X15 != X16
    | X16 = X15 ),
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X18,X20,X19,X19)
    | X18 = X20 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(r2_2,axiom,
    equidistant(X32,reflection(X33,X32),X33,X32),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2_2) ).

cnf(c18,plain,
    X34 = reflection(X34,X34),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[r2_2,identity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(c19,plain,
    reflection(X35,X35) = X35,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c18,symmetry]) ).

cnf(transitivity,axiom,
    ( X316 != X318
    | X318 != X317
    | X316 = X317 ),
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c273,plain,
    ( X654 != reflection(X655,X655)
    | X654 = X655 ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[transitivity,c19]) ).

cnf(u_equals_v,plain,
    u = v,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_equals_v) ).

cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
    X2 = X2,
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c5,axiom,
    ( X427 != X425
    | X426 != X424
    | reflection(X427,X426) = reflection(X425,X424) ),
    theory(equality) ).

cnf(c353,plain,
    ( X1352 != X1353
    | reflection(X1352,X1354) = reflection(X1353,X1354) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5,reflexivity]) ).

cnf(c1570,plain,
    reflection(u,X1368) = reflection(v,X1368),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c353,u_equals_v]) ).

cnf(c1652,plain,
    reflection(u,v) = v,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1570,c273]) ).

cnf(c1664,plain,
    v = reflection(u,v),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1652,symmetry]) ).

cnf(c1683,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c1664,prove_v_equals_reflection]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO056-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:19:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.20/1.41  % Version:  1.5
% 1.20/1.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.20/1.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.20/1.41  
% 1.20/1.41  % Initial clauses    : 45
% 1.20/1.41  % Processed clauses  : 166
% 1.20/1.41  % Factors computed   : 64
% 1.20/1.41  % Resolvents computed: 1617
% 1.20/1.41  % Tautologies deleted: 4
% 1.20/1.41  % Forward subsumed   : 355
% 1.20/1.41  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 1.20/1.41  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.20/1.41  % User time          : 1.042 s
% 1.20/1.41  % System time        : 0.019 s
% 1.20/1.41  % Total time         : 1.061 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------