↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO057-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.35s 2.54s
% Output   : Refutation 2.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : GEO057-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:04:53 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.37  The process was started by sandbox2 on n005.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.37  Sat Jun 18 05:04:53 2022
% 0.21/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1008.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.37  36 back subsumes 33.
% 0.21/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,41,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.37  
% 0.21/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.79/0.99  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.79/0.99  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.79/0.99  number of clauses in intial UL: 32
% 0.79/0.99  number of clauses initially in problem: 39
% 0.79/0.99  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.79/0.99  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 76
% 0.79/0.99  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.79/0.99  absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.79/0.99     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.79/0.99     distinct function count: 6
% 0.79/0.99     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.79/0.99  
% 0.79/0.99  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.35/2.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.35/2.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Model 3 [ 36 61 197365 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.15 sec ----> 76 [binary,74.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.35/2.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.35/2.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 2.35/2.54  16 [] {-} u!=reflection(u,u).
% 2.35/2.54  17 [copy,16,flip.1] {-} reflection(u,u)!=u.
% 2.35/2.54  38 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 2.35/2.54  40,39 [] {-} reflection(A,B)=extension(A,B,A,B).
% 2.35/2.54  42 [back_demod,17,demod,40] {-} extension(u,u,u,u)!=u.
% 2.35/2.54  74 [hyper,38,2,flip.1] {-} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 2.35/2.54  76 [binary,74.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.35/2.54  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  ============ end of search ============
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 2.35/2.54  false clauses given          3
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.35/2.54     3  0         1
% 2.35/2.54     5  0         1
% 2.35/2.54     7  1         0
% 2.35/2.54     9  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    13  2         1
% 2.35/2.54    16  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    17  0         1
% 2.35/2.54    20  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    24  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    30  0         3
% 2.35/2.54    33  3         0
% 2.35/2.54    34  0         1
% 2.35/2.54    35  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    37  1         1
% 2.35/2.54    38  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    39  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    40  0         1
% 2.35/2.54    42  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    43  1         0
% 2.35/2.54    44  0         1
% 2.35/2.54    49  1         0
% 2.35/2.54  tot:  17        11      (39.3% true)
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Model 3 [ 36 61 197365 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.35/2.54  
% 2.35/2.54  Process 1008 finished Sat Jun 18 05:04:55 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------