%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO058-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:28:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.08s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 8 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(d4_5,axiom,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| equidistant(X4,X3,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_5) ).
cnf(r2_2,axiom,
equidistant(X1,reflection(X2,X1),X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2_2) ).
cnf(v_equals_reflection,hypothesis,
v = reflection(u,v),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',v_equals_reflection) ).
cnf(identity_for_equidistance,axiom,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',identity_for_equidistance) ).
cnf(prove_u_equals_v,negated_conjecture,
u != v,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_u_equals_v) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| equidistant(X4,X3,X2,X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d4_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
equidistant(X1,reflection(X2,X1),X2,X1),
r2_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
v = reflection(u,v),
v_equals_reflection ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[identity_for_equidistance]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| equidistant(X4,X3,X2,X1) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
equidistant(v,v,u,v),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
u != v,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_u_equals_v]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3)
| X1 = X2 ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
equidistant(v,u,v,v),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
u != v,
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO058-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 09:05:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % new_bool_1 with pid 3436706 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.08/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.08/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.08/0.43 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3436708 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.08/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.08/0.43 % Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.43
% 0.08/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.43 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.08/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.08/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 10
% 0.08/0.43 % Initial clauses : 26
% 0.08/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.08/0.43 % Processed clauses : 21
% 0.08/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.08/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.08/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.08/0.43 % Generated clauses : 20
% 0.08/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.08/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Paramodulations : 19
% 0.08/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.08/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.08/0.43 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 18
% 0.08/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.08/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.08/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13
% 0.08/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 37
% 0.08/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.08/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.08/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.08/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 21
% 0.08/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.08/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 716
% 0.08/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 113
% 0.08/0.43
% 0.08/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.43 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.43 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.08/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3660 pages
% 0.08/0.43
% 0.08/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.43 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.08/0.43 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.08/0.43 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.08/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.08/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------