↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO059-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:20:56 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.93s 1.11s
% Output   : Refutation 0.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_congruence,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equidistant(v,u,v,reflection(reflection(u,v),v)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_congruence) ).

cnf(d4_5,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X272,X269,X270,X271)
    | equidistant(X271,X270,X269,X272) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d4_5) ).

cnf(d3,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X114,X111,X112,X113)
    | equidistant(X111,X114,X112,X113) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3) ).

cnf(d2,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X82,X79,X80,X81)
    | equidistant(X80,X81,X82,X79) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2) ).

cnf(r2_2,axiom,
    equidistant(X38,reflection(X39,X38),X39,X38),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',r2_2) ).

cnf(c71,plain,
    equidistant(reflection(X121,X122),X122,X121,X122),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d3,r2_2]) ).

cnf(c78,plain,
    equidistant(X131,X132,reflection(X131,X132),X132),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c71,d2]) ).

cnf(c94,plain,
    equidistant(X147,X148,reflection(X148,X147),X147),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c78,d3]) ).

cnf(transitivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    ( ~ equidistant(X11,X10,X14,X13)
    | ~ equidistant(X11,X10,X12,X15)
    | equidistant(X14,X13,X12,X15) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(c20,plain,
    ( ~ equidistant(X690,reflection(X691,X690),X692,X689)
    | equidistant(X692,X689,X691,X690) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[r2_2,transitivity_for_equidistance]) ).

cnf(c533,plain,
    equidistant(reflection(reflection(X1092,X1093),X1093),X1093,X1092,X1093),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c20,c94]) ).

cnf(c926,plain,
    equidistant(X1183,X1182,X1183,reflection(reflection(X1182,X1183),X1183)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c533,d4_5]) ).

cnf(c1209,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c926,prove_congruence]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : GEO059-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:27:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.93/1.11  % Version:  1.5
% 0.93/1.11  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.93/1.11  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.93/1.11  
% 0.93/1.11  % Initial clauses    : 53
% 0.93/1.11  % Processed clauses  : 123
% 0.93/1.11  % Factors computed   : 45
% 0.93/1.11  % Resolvents computed: 1169
% 0.93/1.11  % Tautologies deleted: 4
% 0.93/1.11  % Forward subsumed   : 271
% 0.93/1.11  % Backward subsumed  : 0
% 0.93/1.11  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.93/1.11  % User time          : 0.734 s
% 0.93/1.11  % System time        : 0.021 s
% 0.93/1.11  % Total time         : 0.755 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------