↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO080+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:19:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   7   ~;   6   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn  10   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_reflexivity,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : part_of(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_reflexivity) ).

fof(part_of_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( part_of(X2,X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( incident_c(X3,X2)
         => incident_c(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',part_of_defn) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : part_of(X1,X1),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_reflexivity]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X62,X63,X64,X65,X66] :
      ( ( ~ part_of(X63,X62)
        | ~ incident_c(X64,X63)
        | incident_c(X64,X62) )
      & ( incident_c(esk1_2(X65,X66),X66)
        | part_of(X66,X65) )
      & ( ~ incident_c(esk1_2(X65,X66),X65)
        | part_of(X66,X65) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[part_of_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(esk14_0,esk14_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( part_of(X2,X1)
    | ~ incident_c(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( incident_c(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | part_of(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(esk14_0,esk14_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    part_of(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GEO080+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:39:56 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------