↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : GEO080+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:14:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.36s 3.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    8 (   3   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(part_of_defn,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( 'part$uof'(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( 'incident$uc'(X2,X1)
         => 'incident$uc'(X2,X0) ) ) ).

fof(prove_reflexivity,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : 'part$uof'(X0,X0) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : 'part$uof'(X0,X0),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[prove_reflexivity]) ).

cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( 'incident$uc'(sK3(X1,X0),X0)
    | 'part$uof'(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[part_of_defn]) ).

cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( ~ 'incident$uc'(sK3(X1,X0),X1)
    | 'part$uof'(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[part_of_defn]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    ~ 'part$uof'(sK63,sK63),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( 'part$uof'(X0,X0)
    | 'part$uof'(X0,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_1]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d0,c_54]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : GEO080+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.43  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:40:22 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.36/3.43  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 5.36/3.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------