↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : GEO080+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 29 09:51:28 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.54s 1.32s
% Output   : Refutation 2.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  15   ~;  13   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (  23   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( incident_c(X2,X1)
         => incident_c(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_defn) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : part_of(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_reflexivity) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : part_of(X0,X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( incident_c(X2,X0)
          | ~ incident_c(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ? [X0] : ~ part_of(X0,X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X0)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
            & incident_c(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( incident_c(X2,X0)
            | ~ incident_c(X2,X1) )
        | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X0)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
            & incident_c(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( incident_c(X3,X0)
            | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) )
        | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X0)
        | ( ~ incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          & incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( incident_c(X3,X0)
            | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) )
        | ~ part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f42]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ~ part_of(sK13,sK13),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13]),skolemize(X0,sK13)],[f40]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | part_of(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | part_of(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f109,plain,
    ~ part_of(sK13,sK13),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f114,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( part_of(X0,X0)
      | part_of(X0,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f70,f69]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ! [X0] : part_of(X0,X0),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f114]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f115,f109]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO080+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 06:48:20 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198627)Detected formulas, will run a generic FOF schedule.
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)dis-1011_1_sil=16000:fde=unused:s2agt=70:random_seed=298196121:s2a=on:i=139:gtg=position_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/139Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)First to succeed.
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2198627"
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198638)dis-21_1_sil=8000:lcm=predicate:random_seed=74231297:st=5:avsq=on:i=129:avsqr=1,16:sd=3:aac=none:ep=RS:fsr=off:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/129Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198636)dis-1010_2:3_sil=16000:sp=reverse_frequency:random_seed=813087857:i=119:av=off:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/119Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)lrs+1010_1_to=lpo:sil=32000:sos=on:spb=goal_then_units:bce=on:random_seed=3811240499:i=109:sd=1:ins=1:gsp=on:ss=axioms_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198632)lrs+10_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:tgt=full:npcc=on:drc=off:sp=weighted_frequency:spb=goal:fd=preordered:foolp=on:random_seed=1990972572:i=141193_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141193Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198634)lrs+1010_1_anc=all:sfv=off:to=kbo:ncem=casc2026/models/loop7.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:prc=on:sos=all:bsr=unit_only:sac=on:random_seed=2307669426:i=141695:sd=1:nm=32:gsp=on:ss=included_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/141695Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198633)lrs+11_1_ncem=casc2026/models/loop8.pt:sil=128000:npcc=on:lma=off:spb=units:urr=ec_only:bce=on:s2agt=64:updr=off:random_seed=2475658928:i=134677:sd=20:aac=none:nm=16:ss=included:sgt=10_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/134677Mi)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198638)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198636)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)------------------------------
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Peak memory usage: 88 MB
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198635)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.54/1.32  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.54/1.32  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)------------------------------
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit ea8961452 on 2026-07-16 15:14:34 +0200)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Peak memory usage: 89 MB
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)------------------------------
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198637)------------------------------
% 2.54/1.32  % (2198627)Success in time 0.272 s
% 2.54/1.32  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------