%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO080-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 5 unt; 2 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(part_of_defn_3,axiom,
( ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X2)
| part_of(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_3) ).
cnf(prove_reflexivity,negated_conjecture,
~ part_of(sk14,sk14),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_reflexivity) ).
cnf(part_of_defn_2,axiom,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_2) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X2)
| part_of(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[part_of_defn_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ part_of(sk14,sk14),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X2)
| part_of(X1,X2) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( part_of(X1,X2)
| incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X1) ),
part_of_defn_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ part_of(sk14,sk14),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
part_of(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : GEO080-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 10:06:03 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.51 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.51 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 865025 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.15/0.51 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.51 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.51 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 166s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting new_bool_3 with 162s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting new_bool_1 with 158s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % SubtermCWHack with pid 865029 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.51 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.51 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.51 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.51 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.51 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.51 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.51 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.51
% 0.15/0.51 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.51 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.51 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.51 % Parsed axioms : 49
% 0.15/0.51 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Initial clauses : 49
% 0.15/0.51 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.51 % Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.15/0.51 % Processed clauses : 26
% 0.15/0.51 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.51 % ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 0.15/0.51 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.51 % Generated clauses : 15
% 0.15/0.51 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.15/0.51 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Paramodulations : 15
% 0.15/0.51 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.15/0.51 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.51 % Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.15/0.51 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.51 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.51 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.15/0.51 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28
% 0.15/0.51 % ...number of literals in the above : 106
% 0.15/0.51 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.51 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 70
% 0.15/0.51 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 61
% 0.15/0.51 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.51 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.15/0.51 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/0.51 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.51 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.51 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1734
% 0.15/0.51 % Search garbage collected termcells : 128
% 0.15/0.51
% 0.15/0.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.51 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.51 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.15/0.51 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.15/0.51
% 0.15/0.51 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.51 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.15/0.51 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/0.51 % Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.15/0.51 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.51 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------