↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO081+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:19:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.04s 1.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  31   ~;  28   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   0 sgn  37   !;   8   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( incident_c(X2,X1)
         => incident_c(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+0.ax',part_of_defn) ).

fof(f17,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( part_of(X1,X2)
        & part_of(X0,X1) )
     => part_of(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',part_of_transitivity) ).

fof(f18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( part_of(X1,X2)
          & part_of(X0,X1) )
       => part_of(X0,X2) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f17]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ incident_c(X2,X1)
          | incident_c(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( part_of(X1,X2)
      & part_of(X0,X1)
      & ~ part_of(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( part_of(X1,X2)
      & part_of(X0,X1)
      & ~ part_of(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ part_of(X1,X0)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X2,X1)
            | incident_c(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( incident_c(X2,X1)
            & ~ incident_c(X2,X0) )
        | part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ part_of(X1,X0)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
            | incident_c(X3,X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( incident_c(X2,X1)
            & ~ incident_c(X2,X0) )
        | part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ part_of(X1,X0)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
            | incident_c(X3,X0) ) )
      & ( ( incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
          & ~ incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X0) )
        | part_of(X1,X0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f43]) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ( part_of(sK14,sK15)
    & part_of(sK13,sK14)
    & ~ part_of(sK13,sK15) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13,sK14,sK15]),skolemize(X0,sK13),skolemize(X1,sK14),skolemize(X2,sK15)],[f41]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ part_of(X1,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
      | incident_c(X3,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | part_of(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | part_of(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    part_of(sK14,sK15),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f111,plain,
    part_of(sK13,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    ~ part_of(sK13,sK15),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( part_of(X1,X0)
      | incident_c(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( incident_c(X2,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
      | ~ part_of(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

tcf(c_90,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(sK13,sK15),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).

tcf(c_91,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sK13,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f111]) ).

tcf(c_92,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sK14,sK15),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

tcf(c_2063,plain,
    ( part_of(sK13,sK15)
    | ~ incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK15) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_2064,plain,
    ( part_of(sK13,sK15)
    | incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK13) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_2156,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),X0)
      | ~ part_of(sK13,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK13) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_2864,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK15)
      | ~ part_of(X0,sK15)
      | ~ incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).

tcf(c_3511,plain,
    ( incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK15)
    | ~ part_of(sK14,sK15)
    | ~ incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK14) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2864]) ).

tcf(c_8156,plain,
    ( incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK14)
    | ~ part_of(sK13,sK14)
    | ~ incident_c(sK0(sK15,sK13),sK13) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_2156]) ).

tcf(c_8157,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_8156,c_3511,c_2064,c_2063,c_90,c_91,c_92]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO081+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 10:51:05 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42  
% 0.09/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43  % Proving...
% 4.04/1.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.04/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.04/1.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.04/1.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % 
% 4.04/1.29  % clauses                               44
% 4.04/1.29  % conjectures                           3
% 4.04/1.29  % EPR                                   16
% 4.04/1.29  % Horn                                  28
% 4.04/1.29  % unary                                 4
% 4.04/1.29  % binary                                16
% 4.04/1.29  % lits                                  132
% 4.04/1.29  % lits eq                               12
% 4.04/1.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.04/1.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.04/1.29  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.04/1.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 4.04/1.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ 
% 4.04/1.29  % Current options:
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % ------ Proving...
% 4.04/1.29  % 
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.04/1.29  
% 4.04/1.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------