↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO083-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:19:49 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.09s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  11 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  103 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   77 (  34   ~;  43   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   72 (   0 sgn  72   !;   0   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X2,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
      | ~ part_of(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X0,X1)
      | incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( part_of(X0,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_3) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X2)
      | incident_c(X3,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X0)
      | X0 != sum(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',sum_defn_4) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X2)
      | incident_c(X3,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X0)
      | sum(X1,X2) != X0 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
      | X0 != sum(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',sum_defn_5) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
      | sum(X1,X2) != X0 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X2)
      | X0 != sum(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',sum_defn_6) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X0)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X2)
      | sum(X1,X2) != X0 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f66,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk15,sk16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_6_1_67) ).

fof(f69,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(sum(sk14,sk15),sum(sk14,sk16)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_6_1_70) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,X2)
      | incident_c(X3,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X3,sum(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X1) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f72,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X1] :
      ( incident_c(X3,sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ incident_c(X3,X2) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( incident_c(X2,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X2,X0)
      | ~ part_of(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_102,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,X1)
      | incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_103,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_104,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( incident_c(X0,X2)
      | incident_c(X0,X1)
      | ~ incident_c(X0,sum(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

tcf(c_105,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( incident_c(X0,sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ incident_c(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

tcf(c_106,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( incident_c(X0,sum(X2,X1))
      | ~ incident_c(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f72]) ).

tcf(c_144,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk15,sk16),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

tcf(c_147,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(sum(sk14,sk15),sum(sk14,sk16)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f69]) ).

tcf(c_845,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = sum(sk14,sk15),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_846,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = sum(sk14,sk16),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_847,negated_conjecture,
    ~ part_of(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_846,c_845]) ).

tcf(c_850,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk15,sk16),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_144]) ).

tcf(c_1633,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( incident_c(X0,sk16)
      | ~ incident_c(X0,sk15) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_850,c_101]) ).

tcf(c_1649,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,sum(X1,X2)),X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_1665,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,sum(X1,X2))
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,sum(X1,X2)),X2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_103]) ).

tcf(c_1832,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( part_of(sum(X0,X1),X2)
      | incident_c(ax0_sk1(sum(X0,X1),X2),X1)
      | incident_c(ax0_sk1(sum(X0,X1),X2),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_102,c_104]) ).

tcf(c_4575,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,sum(sk14,sk16))
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,iPr_def_11),sk14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_846,c_1649]) ).

tcf(c_4577,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,iPr_def_11),sk14) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4575,c_846]) ).

tcf(c_6061,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,sum(sk14,sk16))
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,iPr_def_11),sk16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_846,c_1665]) ).

tcf(c_6063,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( part_of(X0,iPr_def_11)
      | ~ incident_c(ax0_sk1(X0,iPr_def_11),sk16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_6061,c_846]) ).

tcf(c_8182,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( part_of(sum(X0,sk15),X1)
      | incident_c(ax0_sk1(sum(X0,sk15),X1),sk16)
      | incident_c(ax0_sk1(sum(X0,sk15),X1),X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1832,c_1633]) ).

tcf(c_8960,plain,
    ( part_of(sum(sk14,sk15),iPr_def_11)
    | incident_c(ax0_sk1(sum(sk14,sk15),iPr_def_11),sk16) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8182,c_4577]) ).

tcf(c_8971,plain,
    ( part_of(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
    | incident_c(ax0_sk1(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),sk16) ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8960,c_845]) ).

tcf(c_8972,plain,
    incident_c(ax0_sk1(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),sk16),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8971,c_847]) ).

tcf(c_9189,plain,
    part_of(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_8972,c_6063]) ).

tcf(c_9190,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9189,c_847]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO083-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 10:47:55 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.42  
% 0.13/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.44  % Proving...
% 4.09/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.09/6.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.09/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.09/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % 
% 4.09/6.30  % clauses                               49
% 4.09/6.30  % conjectures                           4
% 4.09/6.30  % EPR                                   19
% 4.09/6.30  % Horn                                  33
% 4.09/6.30  % unary                                 7
% 4.09/6.30  % binary                                18
% 4.09/6.30  % lits                                  139
% 4.09/6.30  % lits eq                               14
% 4.09/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.09/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.09/6.30  % fd_cond                               0
% 4.09/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        7
% 4.09/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ 
% 4.09/6.30  % Current options:
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 4.09/6.30  % 
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.09/6.30  
% 4.09/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------