↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : GEO087-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:29:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   46 (   0 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(part_of_defn_1,axiom,
    ( ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',part_of_defn_1) ).

cnf(inner_point_defn_22,axiom,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',inner_point_defn_22) ).

cnf(meet_defn_26,axiom,
    ( ~ incident_c(X4,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X4,X2)
    | ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
    | end_point(X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',meet_defn_26) ).

cnf(corollary_2_9_67,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk14,sk15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_9_67) ).

cnf(inner_point_defn_21,axiom,
    ( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',inner_point_defn_21) ).

cnf(c3_37,axiom,
    inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',c3_37) ).

cnf(corollary_2_9_68,negated_conjecture,
    meet(sk16,sk14,sk15),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_2_9_68) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[part_of_defn_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ incident_c(X4,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X4,X2)
    | ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
    | end_point(X4,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[meet_defn_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ incident_c(X3,X1)
    | ~ part_of(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    part_of(sk14,sk15),
    corollary_2_9_67 ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    c3_37 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ incident_c(X4,X3)
    | ~ incident_c(X4,X2)
    | ~ meet(X1,X2,X3)
    | end_point(X4,X2) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    meet(sk16,sk14,sk15),
    corollary_2_9_68 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_c(X1,sk14)
    | incident_c(X1,sk15) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ~ end_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_c(X1,sk14)
    | end_point(X1,sk14) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    incident_c(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO087-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 10:27:59 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 1678018 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_B07----S_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 166s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 162s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 158s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1678024 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 50
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 50
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 5
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 45
% 0.14/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 142
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.14/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 27
% 0.14/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 114
% 0.14/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 307
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 262
% 0.14/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 301
% 0.14/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 33
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 21
% 0.14/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 90
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 15
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.14/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 71
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137
% 0.14/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 503
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.14/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1518
% 0.14/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1177
% 0.14/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 36
% 0.14/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70
% 0.14/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4960
% 0.14/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 126
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.031 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.046 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------