↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO087-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:18:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 93.79s 93.98s
% Output   : Refutation 93.79s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : GEO087-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:20:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Sat Jun 18 07:20:01 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 2937.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35    Following clause subsumed by 59 during input processing: 0 [copy,59,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35  59 back subsumes 51.
% 0.12/0.35  59 back subsumes 50.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 46
% 0.18/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 58
% 0.18/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 79
% 0.18/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 80
% 0.18/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 25
% 0.18/0.41     distinct predicate count: 8
% 0.18/0.41     distinct function count: 14
% 0.18/0.41     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.41  
% 0.18/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Changing weight limit from 60 to 38.
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Model 4 [ 2 3 21960 ] (0.00 seconds, 29688 Inserts)
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Model 5 [ 9 0 3485 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Model 6 [ 2 4 33175 ] (0.00 seconds, 34886 Inserts)
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Model 7 [ 2 2 19633 ] (0.00 seconds, 26627 Inserts)
% 48.82/49.04  
% 48.82/49.04  Resetting weight limit to 38 after 50 givens.
% 48.82/49.04  
% 86.12/86.31  
% 86.12/86.31  
% 86.12/86.31  Changing weight limit from 38 to 34.
% 86.12/86.31  
% 86.12/86.31  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 55 givens.
% 86.12/86.31  
% 88.49/88.76  
% 88.49/88.76  
% 88.49/88.76  Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 88.49/88.76  
% 88.49/88.76  Resetting weight limit to 33 after 60 givens.
% 88.49/88.76  
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at  93.59 sec ----> 11391 [hyper,5063,17,55] {-} $F.
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 3.
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 93.79/93.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 93.79/93.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  1 [] {+} -part_of(A,B)| -incident_c(C,A)|incident_c(C,B).
% 93.79/93.98  16 [] {+} -inner_point(A,B)|incident_c(A,B).
% 93.79/93.98  17 [] {+} -inner_point(A,B)| -end_point(A,B).
% 93.79/93.98  21 [] {+} -meet(A,B,C)| -incident_c(D,B)| -incident_c(D,C)|end_point(D,B).
% 93.79/93.98  55 [] {-} inner_point(ax0_sk8(A),A).
% 93.79/93.98  57 [] {+} part_of(sk14,sk15).
% 93.79/93.98  58 [] {+} meet(sk16,sk14,sk15).
% 93.79/93.98  96 [hyper,55,16] {+} incident_c(ax0_sk8(A),A).
% 93.79/93.98  616 [hyper,96,1,57] {+} incident_c(ax0_sk8(sk14),sk15).
% 93.79/93.98  5063 [hyper,616,21,58,96] {+} end_point(ax0_sk8(sk14),sk14).
% 93.79/93.98  11391 [hyper,5063,17,55] {-} $F.
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 93.79/93.98  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  ============ end of search ============
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  true clauses given          29      (39.7%)
% 93.79/93.98  false clauses given         44
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98        FALSE     TRUE
% 93.79/93.98     4  0         4
% 93.79/93.98     5  0         6
% 93.79/93.98     6  0         10
% 93.79/93.98     7  0         3
% 93.79/93.98     8  0         10
% 93.79/93.98     9  0         3
% 93.79/93.98    10  0         25
% 93.79/93.98    11  0         43
% 93.79/93.98    12  0         61
% 93.79/93.98    13  0         47
% 93.79/93.98    14  0         36
% 93.79/93.98    15  0         23
% 93.79/93.98    16  0         35
% 93.79/93.98    17  0         95
% 93.79/93.98    18  0         134
% 93.79/93.98    19  1         142
% 93.79/93.98    20  32        188
% 93.79/93.98    21  40        105
% 93.79/93.98    22  18        103
% 93.79/93.98    23  26        99
% 93.79/93.98    24  66        91
% 93.79/93.98    25  46        172
% 93.79/93.98    26  108       191
% 93.79/93.98    27  200       219
% 93.79/93.98    28  195       209
% 93.79/93.98    29  228       342
% 93.79/93.98    30  350       204
% 93.79/93.98    31  586       11
% 93.79/93.98    32  486       5
% 93.79/93.98    33  188       25
% 93.79/93.98  tot:  2570      2641      (50.7% true)
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  Model 7 [ 2 2 19633 ] (0.01 seconds, 26627 Inserts)
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 93.79/93.98  
% 93.79/93.98  Process 2937 finished Sat Jun 18 07:21:35 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------