↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GEO112-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:07:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 17.27s 5.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 17.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO112-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:57:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 51 Number of unprocessed: 51
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.54  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.54  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.54  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.54  # 51 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.54  # Creating start rules for all 2 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.54  # There are 2 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.54  # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.54  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.18/0.54  # 2 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.54  # 47 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.54  # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.54  
% 0.18/0.54  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.18/0.54  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 2
% 3.36/3.57  # Returning from population with 12 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 3.36/3.57  # We now have 12 tableaux to operate on
% 17.27/5.33  # Creating equality axioms
% 17.27/5.33  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 11 total branch saturation attempts.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 4 of these attempts blocked.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 5 total successful branch saturations.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 1 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 17.27/5.34  # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 17.27/5.34  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.27/5.34  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 17.27/5.34  # Begin clausification derivation
% 17.27/5.34  
% 17.27/5.34  # End clausification derivation
% 17.27/5.34  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_111, negated_conjecture, (between_c(sk15,sk16,sk17,sk18))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_112, negated_conjecture, (~between_c(sk15,sk18,sk17,sk16))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_105, plain, (~between_c(X1,X2,X3,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_78, plain, (~inner_point(X1,X2)|~end_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (~closed(X1)|~end_point(X2,X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_98, plain, (ax0_sk11(X1,X2)!=X1|~end_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (incident_c(X1,X2)|~end_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_77, plain, (incident_c(X1,X2)|~inner_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (open(X1)|~end_point(X2,X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (closed(X1)|end_point(ax0_sk6(X1),X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_81, plain, (incident_c(X1,X2)|~meet(X1,X3,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_80, plain, (incident_c(X1,X2)|~meet(X1,X2,X3))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (end_point(ax0_sk7(X1),X1)|~open(X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_59, plain, (part_of(X1,X2)|~incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (X1=X2|open(X1)|~part_of(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (incident_c(ax0_sk1(X1,X2),X1)|part_of(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_79, plain, (inner_point(X1,X2)|end_point(X1,X2)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (incident_c(X1,X2)|~incident_c(X1,X3)|~part_of(X3,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_97, plain, (end_point(ax0_sk11(X1,X2),X2)|~end_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_75, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|~incident_c(X1,X2)|~part_of(ax0_sk3(X2,X1),ax0_sk4(X2,X1)))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_100, plain, (ax0_sk12(X1,X2)=sum(X2,X1)|~meet(X3,X2,X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_62, plain, (incident_c(X1,sum(X2,X3))|~incident_c(X1,X3))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_61, plain, (incident_c(X1,sum(X2,X3))|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_96, plain, (X1=X2|X1=X3|X2=X3|~end_point(X3,X4)|~end_point(X2,X4)|~end_point(X1,X4))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_73, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|incident_c(X1,ax0_sk3(X2,X1))|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_76, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|~incident_c(X1,X2)|~part_of(ax0_sk4(X2,X1),ax0_sk3(X2,X1)))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_104, plain, (X1=X2|~incident_c(ax0_sk13(X1,X2),X2)|~incident_c(ax0_sk13(X1,X2),X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_83, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|~meet(X3,X4,X2)|~incident_c(X1,X2)|~incident_c(X1,X4))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_82, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|~meet(X3,X2,X4)|~incident_c(X1,X4)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_74, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|incident_c(X1,ax0_sk4(X2,X1))|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|part_of(ax0_sk3(X2,X1),X2)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (end_point(X1,X2)|part_of(ax0_sk4(X2,X1),X2)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_108, plain, (end_point(X1,ax1_sk1(X1,X2,X3,X4))|~between_c(X4,X3,X2,X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_107, plain, (end_point(X1,ax1_sk1(X2,X3,X1,X4))|~between_c(X4,X1,X3,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_60, plain, (incident_c(X1,X2)|incident_c(X1,X3)|~incident_c(X1,sum(X3,X2)))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_109, plain, (inner_point(X1,ax1_sk1(X2,X1,X3,X4))|~between_c(X4,X3,X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (part_of(ax1_sk1(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)|~between_c(X4,X3,X2,X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_67, plain, (X1=sum(X2,X3)|~incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X1)|~incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (X1=sum(X2,X3)|~incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X1)|~incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X3))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_95, plain, (sum(ax0_sk9(X1,X2),ax0_sk10(X1,X2))=X2|~inner_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_94, plain, (meet(X1,ax0_sk9(X1,X2),ax0_sk10(X1,X2))|~inner_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_101, plain, (X1=X2|incident_c(ax0_sk13(X1,X2),X1)|incident_c(ax0_sk13(X1,X2),X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_85, plain, (meet(X1,X2,X3)|incident_c(ax0_sk5(X3,X2,X1),X3)|~incident_c(X1,X3)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_84, plain, (meet(X1,X2,X3)|incident_c(ax0_sk5(X3,X2,X1),X2)|~incident_c(X1,X3)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (part_of(X1,X2)|part_of(X2,X1)|~end_point(X3,X4)|~incident_c(X3,X2)|~incident_c(X3,X1)|~part_of(X2,X4)|~part_of(X1,X4))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_99, plain, (meet(X1,X2,X3)|~closed(sum(X2,X3))|~meet(X4,X2,X3)|~end_point(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (meet(X1,X2,X3)|~end_point(ax0_sk5(X3,X2,X1),X3)|~end_point(ax0_sk5(X3,X2,X1),X2)|~incident_c(X1,X3)|~incident_c(X1,X2))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_110, plain, (X1=X2|between_c(X3,X1,X4,X2)|~inner_point(X4,X5)|~end_point(X2,X5)|~end_point(X1,X5)|~part_of(X5,X3))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_63, plain, (X1=sum(X2,X3)|incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X3)|incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X2)|incident_c(ax0_sk2(X3,X2,X1),X1))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_92, plain, (part_of(X1,X2)|part_of(X1,X3)|part_of(X2,X1)|part_of(X2,X3)|part_of(X3,X1)|part_of(X3,X2)|~end_point(X4,X3)|~end_point(X4,X2)|~end_point(X4,X1)|~part_of(X3,X5)|~part_of(X2,X5)|~part_of(X1,X5))).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314298, plain, (X6=X6)).
% 17.27/5.34  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 17.27/5.34  # Begin printing tableau
% 17.27/5.34  # Found 12 steps
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_110, plain, (sk18=sk16|between_c(sk15,sk18,sk17,sk16)|~inner_point(sk17,ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15))|~end_point(sk16,ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15))|~end_point(sk18,ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15))|~part_of(ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15),sk15)), inference(start_rule)).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314454, plain, (between_c(sk15,sk18,sk17,sk16)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_112])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314453, plain, (sk18=sk16), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_314316])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_355039, plain, (ax0_sk7(sk18)=ax0_sk7(sk16)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_314317])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_355045, plain, (ax0_sk8(ax0_sk7(sk18))=ax0_sk8(ax0_sk7(sk16))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_314318])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_355053, plain, ($false), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_314298])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314455, plain, (~inner_point(sk17,ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_109])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_355055, plain, (~between_c(sk15,sk16,sk17,sk18)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_111])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314456, plain, (~end_point(sk16,ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_314456, ...])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314457, plain, (~end_point(sk18,ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_314457, ...])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_314458, plain, (~part_of(ax1_sk1(sk18,sk17,sk16,sk15),sk15)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_314458, ...])).
% 17.27/5.34  cnf(i_0_355051, plain, (ax0_sk9(ax0_sk8(ax0_sk7(sk18)),X1)=ax0_sk9(ax0_sk8(ax0_sk7(sk16)),X1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_355051, ...])).
% 17.27/5.34  # End printing tableau
% 17.27/5.34  # SZS output end
% 17.27/5.34  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 17.27/5.38  # Child (12111) has found a proof.
% 17.27/5.38  
% 17.27/5.38  # Proof search is over...
% 17.27/5.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------