↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : GEO117+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 24 01:38:10 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  14   ~;   9   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   2 sgn  17   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(theorem_4_4,plain,
    ! [O,P] : ~ ordered_by(O,P,P),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_4_4) ).

fof(theorem_4_4_negated,plain,
    ~ ! [O,P] : ~ ordered_by(O,P,P),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[theorem_4_4]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ordered_by(sK28,sK29,sK29),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[theorem_4_4_negated]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    ordered_by(sK28,sK29,sK29),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[91]) ).

fof(between_o_defn,plain,
    ! [O,P,Q,R] :
      ( between_o(O,P,Q,R)
    <=> ( ( ordered_by(O,P,Q)
          & ordered_by(O,Q,R) )
        | ( ordered_by(O,R,Q)
          & ordered_by(O,Q,P) ) ) ),
    file('Axioms/GEO004+2.ax',between_o_defn) ).

cnf(53,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ ordered_by(X0,X2,X3)
    | between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[between_o_defn]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(sK28,sK29,sK29)
    | ~ ordered_by(sK28,sK29,sK29)
    | between_o(sK28,sK29,sK29,sK29) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[53]) ).

fof(o3,plain,
    ! [P,Q,R,O] :
      ( between_o(O,P,Q,R)
    <=> ? [C] :
          ( ! [P] :
              ( incident_o(P,O)
            <=> incident_c(P,C) )
          & between_c(C,P,Q,R) ) ),
    file('Axioms/GEO004+2.ax',o3) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ( ~ between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3)
    | between_c(sK20(X1,X2,X3,X0),X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[o3]) ).

cnf(l31,plain,
    ( ~ between_o(sK28,sK29,sK29,sK29)
    | between_c(sK20(sK29,sK29,sK29,sK28),sK29,sK29,sK29) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[74]) ).

fof(between_c_defn,plain,
    ! [C,P,Q,R] :
      ( between_c(C,P,Q,R)
    <=> ( P != R
        & ? [Cpp] :
            ( part_of(Cpp,C)
            & end_point(P,Cpp)
            & end_point(R,Cpp)
            & inner_point(Q,Cpp) ) ) ),
    file('Axioms/GEO004+1.ax',between_c_defn) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    ( X0 != X1
    | ~ between_c(X2,X0,X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[between_c_defn]) ).

cnf(l43,plain,
    ( sK29 != sK29
    | ~ between_c(sK20(sK29,sK29,sK29,sK28),sK29,sK29,sK29) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[45]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l31,l43]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO117+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jul 20 11:13:04 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.12/0.33  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.12/0.39  % launching worker at depth: 11
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.17/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------