%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:21:33 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 9.41s 2.14s % Output : Proof 14.06s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO124+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:02:17 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.60 % 0.19/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.63 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.63 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 3.45/1.23 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 3.45/1.23 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.96/1.27 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.96/1.27 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.96/1.27 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.96/1.27 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.96/1.28 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 7.78/1.78 Prover 5: Proving ... % 7.78/1.79 Prover 2: Proving ... % 7.78/1.86 Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.46/1.90 Prover 6: Proving ... % 8.46/1.90 Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 8.64/1.92 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.64/1.92 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.41/2.14 Prover 2: proved (1517ms) % 9.41/2.14 % 9.41/2.14 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 9.41/2.14 % 9.41/2.15 Prover 5: stopped % 9.41/2.15 Prover 6: stopped % 9.41/2.16 Prover 3: stopped % 9.41/2.17 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 9.41/2.17 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 9.41/2.17 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 9.41/2.17 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 9.41/2.20 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 10.07/2.23 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 10.07/2.23 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 10.07/2.23 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 11.53/2.32 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 11.53/2.32 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 11.53/2.36 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.53/2.36 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.53/2.40 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 11.53/2.40 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 12.27/2.42 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.27/2.46 Prover 0: Proving ... % 12.27/2.47 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.27/2.49 Prover 0: stopped % 12.90/2.50 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 12.90/2.53 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 12.90/2.55 Prover 10: Found proof (size 23) % 12.90/2.55 Prover 10: proved (381ms) % 12.90/2.55 Prover 8: stopped % 12.90/2.55 Prover 7: stopped % 12.90/2.55 Prover 1: stopped % 12.90/2.56 Prover 4: stopped % 12.90/2.56 Prover 13: stopped % 13.61/2.70 Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 14.06/2.73 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.06/2.74 Prover 11: stopped % 14.06/2.74 % 14.06/2.74 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 14.06/2.74 % 14.06/2.75 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 14.06/2.75 Assumptions after simplification: % 14.06/2.75 --------------------------------- % 14.06/2.75 % 14.06/2.75 (between_c_defn) % 14.06/2.76 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : (v3 = v1 % 14.06/2.76 | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.06/2.76 inner_point(v2, v4) | ~ end_point(v3, v4) | ~ end_point(v1, v4) | ~ % 14.06/2.76 part_of(v4, v0) | between_c(v0, v1, v2, v3)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : % 14.06/2.76 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.06/2.76 between_c(v0, v1, v2, v3) | ? [v4: $i] : ($i(v4) & inner_point(v2, v4) & % 14.06/2.76 end_point(v3, v4) & end_point(v1, v4) & part_of(v4, v0))) & ! [v0: $i] : % 14.06/2.76 ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.06/2.76 between_c(v0, v1, v2, v1)) % 14.06/2.76 % 14.06/2.76 (between_o_defn) % 14.06/2.77 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) % 14.06/2.77 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ordered_by(v0, v3, v2) | ~ ordered_by(v0, v2, % 14.06/2.77 v1) | between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] % 14.06/2.77 : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.06/2.77 ordered_by(v0, v2, v3) | ~ ordered_by(v0, v1, v2) | between_o(v0, v1, v2, % 14.06/2.77 v3)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) % 14.06/2.77 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3) | % 14.06/2.77 ordered_by(v0, v3, v2) | ordered_by(v0, v2, v3)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] % 14.06/2.77 : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | % 14.06/2.77 ~ between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3) | ordered_by(v0, v3, v2) | ordered_by(v0, v1, % 14.06/2.77 v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) % 14.06/2.77 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3) | % 14.06/2.77 ordered_by(v0, v2, v3) | ordered_by(v0, v2, v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] % 14.06/2.77 : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | % 14.06/2.77 ~ between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3) | ordered_by(v0, v2, v1) | ordered_by(v0, v1, % 14.06/2.77 v2)) % 14.06/2.77 % 14.06/2.77 (corollary_4_10_1) % 14.06/2.77 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & % 14.06/2.77 $i(v0) & start_point(v2, v0) & start_point(v1, v0)) % 14.06/2.77 % 14.06/2.77 (o3) % 14.06/2.77 ? [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ % 14.06/2.77 $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ between_c(v4, % 14.06/2.77 v1, v2, v3) | between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3) | ? [v5: $i] : ($i(v5) & ( ~ % 14.06/2.77 incident_o(v5, v0) | ~ incident_c(v5, v4)) & (incident_o(v5, v0) | % 14.06/2.77 incident_c(v5, v4)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! % 14.06/2.77 [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ between_o(v3, % 14.06/2.77 v0, v1, v2) | ? [v4: $i] : ($i(v4) & between_c(v4, v0, v1, v2) & ! [v5: % 14.06/2.77 $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ incident_o(v5, v3) | incident_c(v5, v4)) & ! [v5: % 14.06/2.77 $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ incident_c(v5, v4) | incident_o(v5, v3)))) % 14.06/2.77 % 14.06/2.77 (start_point_defn) % 14.06/2.77 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v0 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | % 14.06/2.77 ~ $i(v0) | ~ incident_o(v2, v1) | ~ start_point(v0, v1) | ordered_by(v1, % 14.06/2.77 v0, v2)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.06/2.77 incident_o(v0, v1) | start_point(v0, v1) | ? [v2: $i] : ( ~ (v2 = v0) & % 14.06/2.77 $i(v2) & incident_o(v2, v1) & ~ ordered_by(v1, v0, v2))) & ! [v0: $i] : % 14.06/2.77 ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ start_point(v0, v1) | incident_o(v0, % 14.06/2.77 v1)) % 14.06/2.77 % 14.06/2.77 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 14.06/2.77 -------------------------------------------- % 14.06/2.77 c1, c2, c3, c4, c5, c6, c7, c8, c9, closed_defn, end_point_defn, % 14.06/2.77 finish_point_defn, inner_point_defn, meet_defn, o1, o2, o4, o5, o6, open_defn, % 14.06/2.77 part_of_defn, sum_defn, underlying_curve_defn % 14.06/2.77 % 14.06/2.77 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 14.06/2.77 --------------------------------- % 14.06/2.77 % 14.06/2.77 Begin of proof % 14.06/2.77 | % 14.06/2.77 | ALPHA: (between_c_defn) implies: % 14.06/2.77 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ % 14.06/2.77 | $i(v0) | ~ between_c(v0, v1, v2, v1)) % 14.06/2.77 | % 14.06/2.77 | ALPHA: (between_o_defn) implies: % 14.06/2.78 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ % 14.06/2.78 | $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ ordered_by(v0, v3, v2) | ~ % 14.06/2.78 | ordered_by(v0, v2, v1) | between_o(v0, v1, v2, v3)) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | ALPHA: (start_point_defn) implies: % 14.06/2.78 | (3) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ start_point(v0, % 14.06/2.78 | v1) | incident_o(v0, v1)) % 14.06/2.78 | (4) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v2 = v0 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ % 14.06/2.78 | $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ incident_o(v2, v1) | ~ start_point(v0, v1) | % 14.06/2.78 | ordered_by(v1, v0, v2)) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | ALPHA: (o3) implies: % 14.06/2.78 | (5) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ % 14.06/2.78 | $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ between_o(v3, v0, v1, v2) | ? % 14.06/2.78 | [v4: $i] : ($i(v4) & between_c(v4, v0, v1, v2) & ! [v5: $i] : ( ~ % 14.06/2.78 | $i(v5) | ~ incident_o(v5, v3) | incident_c(v5, v4)) & ! [v5: % 14.06/2.78 | $i] : ( ~ $i(v5) | ~ incident_c(v5, v4) | incident_o(v5, v3)))) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | DELTA: instantiating (corollary_4_10_1) with fresh symbols all_29_0, all_29_1, % 14.06/2.78 | all_29_2 gives: % 14.06/2.78 | (6) ~ (all_29_0 = all_29_1) & $i(all_29_0) & $i(all_29_1) & $i(all_29_2) & % 14.06/2.78 | start_point(all_29_0, all_29_2) & start_point(all_29_1, all_29_2) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | ALPHA: (6) implies: % 14.06/2.78 | (7) ~ (all_29_0 = all_29_1) % 14.06/2.78 | (8) start_point(all_29_1, all_29_2) % 14.06/2.78 | (9) start_point(all_29_0, all_29_2) % 14.06/2.78 | (10) $i(all_29_2) % 14.06/2.78 | (11) $i(all_29_1) % 14.06/2.78 | (12) $i(all_29_0) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_29_1, all_29_2, simplifying with (8), % 14.06/2.78 | (10), (11) gives: % 14.06/2.78 | (13) incident_o(all_29_1, all_29_2) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_29_0, all_29_2, simplifying with (9), % 14.06/2.78 | (10), (12) gives: % 14.06/2.78 | (14) incident_o(all_29_0, all_29_2) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_29_0, all_29_2, all_29_1, simplifying % 14.06/2.78 | with (9), (10), (11), (12), (13) gives: % 14.06/2.78 | (15) all_29_0 = all_29_1 | ordered_by(all_29_2, all_29_0, all_29_1) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_29_1, all_29_2, all_29_0, simplifying % 14.06/2.78 | with (8), (10), (11), (12), (14) gives: % 14.06/2.78 | (16) all_29_0 = all_29_1 | ordered_by(all_29_2, all_29_1, all_29_0) % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | BETA: splitting (15) gives: % 14.06/2.78 | % 14.06/2.78 | Case 1: % 14.06/2.78 | | % 14.06/2.78 | | (17) ordered_by(all_29_2, all_29_0, all_29_1) % 14.06/2.78 | | % 14.06/2.78 | | BETA: splitting (16) gives: % 14.06/2.78 | | % 14.06/2.78 | | Case 1: % 14.06/2.78 | | | % 14.06/2.78 | | | (18) ordered_by(all_29_2, all_29_1, all_29_0) % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_29_2, all_29_1, all_29_0, % 14.06/2.79 | | | all_29_1, simplifying with (10), (11), (12), (17), (18) % 14.06/2.79 | | | gives: % 14.06/2.79 | | | (19) between_o(all_29_2, all_29_1, all_29_0, all_29_1) % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_29_1, all_29_0, all_29_1, % 14.06/2.79 | | | all_29_2, simplifying with (10), (11), (12), (19) gives: % 14.06/2.79 | | | (20) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & between_c(v0, all_29_1, all_29_0, % 14.06/2.79 | | | all_29_1) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ incident_o(v1, % 14.06/2.79 | | | all_29_2) | incident_c(v1, v0)) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | % 14.06/2.79 | | | ~ incident_c(v1, v0) | incident_o(v1, all_29_2))) % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbol all_76_0 gives: % 14.06/2.79 | | | (21) $i(all_76_0) & between_c(all_76_0, all_29_1, all_29_0, all_29_1) & % 14.06/2.79 | | | ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ incident_o(v0, all_29_2) | % 14.06/2.79 | | | incident_c(v0, all_76_0)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 14.06/2.79 | | | incident_c(v0, all_76_0) | incident_o(v0, all_29_2)) % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | ALPHA: (21) implies: % 14.06/2.79 | | | (22) between_c(all_76_0, all_29_1, all_29_0, all_29_1) % 14.06/2.79 | | | (23) $i(all_76_0) % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_76_0, all_29_1, all_29_0, % 14.06/2.79 | | | simplifying with (11), (12), (22), (23) gives: % 14.06/2.79 | | | (24) $false % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | CLOSE: (24) is inconsistent. % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | Case 2: % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | (25) all_29_0 = all_29_1 % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | REDUCE: (7), (25) imply: % 14.06/2.79 | | | (26) $false % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | | CLOSE: (26) is inconsistent. % 14.06/2.79 | | | % 14.06/2.79 | | End of split % 14.06/2.79 | | % 14.06/2.79 | Case 2: % 14.06/2.79 | | % 14.06/2.79 | | (27) all_29_0 = all_29_1 % 14.06/2.79 | | % 14.06/2.79 | | REDUCE: (7), (27) imply: % 14.06/2.79 | | (28) $false % 14.06/2.79 | | % 14.06/2.79 | | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent. % 14.06/2.79 | | % 14.06/2.79 | End of split % 14.06/2.79 | % 14.06/2.79 End of proof % 14.06/2.79 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 14.06/2.79 % 14.06/2.79 2186ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------