↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO124-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:19:57 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 12.17s 2.77s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   69 (  37   ~;  32   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   61 (   0 sgn  61   !;   0   ?;  38   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f66,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( X1 != X3
      | ~ between_c(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-1.ax',between_c_defn_1) ).

fof(f76,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',between_o_defn_5) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( incident_o(X0,X1)
      | ~ start_point(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',start_point_defn_7) ).

fof(f79,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ordered_by(X1,X0,X2)
      | ~ incident_o(X2,X1)
      | X0 = X2
      | ~ start_point(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',start_point_defn_8) ).

fof(f90,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( incident_o(X1,X0)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o1_17) ).

fof(f97,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( between_c(ax2_sk4(X0,X3,X2,X1),X1,X2,X3)
      | ~ between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o3_24) ).

fof(f124,negated_conjecture,
    start_point(sk26,sk25),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_4_10_1_133) ).

fof(f125,negated_conjecture,
    start_point(sk27,sk25),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_4_10_1_134) ).

fof(f126,negated_conjecture,
    sk26 != sk27,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_4_10_1_135) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0] : ~ between_c(X0,X3,X2,X3),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f66]) ).

tcf(c_191,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ~ between_c(X0,X1,X2,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f131]) ).

tcf(c_201,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X2,X3)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

tcf(c_203,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( incident_o(X0,X1)
      | ~ start_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

tcf(c_204,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ordered_by(X1,X0,X2)
      | ( X0 = X2 )
      | ~ incident_o(X2,X1)
      | ~ start_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

tcf(c_213,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( incident_o(X1,X0)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f90]) ).

tcf(c_220,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( between_c(ax2_sk4(X0,X3,X2,X1),X1,X2,X3)
      | ~ between_o(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

tcf(c_233,negated_conjecture,
    start_point(sk26,sk25),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

tcf(c_234,negated_conjecture,
    start_point(sk27,sk25),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

tcf(c_235,negated_conjecture,
    sk26 != sk27,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tcf(c_422,plain,
    ( incident_o(sk27,sk25)
    | ~ start_point(sk27,sk25) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_203]) ).

tcf(c_2739,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ~ between_o(X0,X1,X2,X1),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_220,c_191]) ).

tcf(c_2767,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ~ ordered_by(X0,X2,X1)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_201,c_2739]) ).

tcf(c_2797,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ incident_o(X1,X0)
      | ~ start_point(X2,X0)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_2767]) ).

tcf(c_2842,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2)
      | ~ start_point(X2,X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_2797,c_213,c_2797]) ).

tcf(c_2843,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ~ start_point(X2,X0)
      | ~ ordered_by(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_2842]) ).

tcf(c_2844,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X2 )
      | ~ incident_o(X2,X1)
      | ~ start_point(X2,X1)
      | ~ start_point(X0,X1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_2843]) ).

tcf(c_2853,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = sk26 )
      | ~ incident_o(X0,sk25)
      | ~ start_point(X0,sk25) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_233,c_2844]) ).

tcf(c_2860,plain,
    ( ( sk26 = sk27 )
    | ~ incident_o(sk27,sk25) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_234,c_2853]) ).

tcf(c_2862,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2860,c_422,c_235,c_234]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO124-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 10:58:36 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.02/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.02/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.02/0.43  % Proving...
% 12.17/2.77  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 12.17/2.77  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------  iProver source info
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 12.17/2.77  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 12.17/2.77  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e % 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Preprocessing...% 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Proving...
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % 
% 12.17/2.77  % clauses                               88
% 12.17/2.77  % conjectures                           7
% 12.17/2.77  % EPR                                   32
% 12.17/2.77  % Horn                                  57
% 12.17/2.77  % unary                                 7
% 12.17/2.77  % binary                                31
% 12.17/2.77  % lits                                  258
% 12.17/2.77  % lits eq                               25
% 12.17/2.77  % fd_pure                               0
% 12.17/2.77  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 12.17/2.77  % fd_cond                               0
% 12.17/2.77  % fd_pseudo_cond                        17
% 12.17/2.77  % AC symbols                            0
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ 
% 12.17/2.77  % Current options:
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % ------ Proving...
% 12.17/2.77  % 
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 12.17/2.77  
% 12.17/2.77  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------