↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : GEO126+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:14:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 20.57s 3.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 20.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO126+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 12:50:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 20.57/3.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 20.57/3.05  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 20.57/3.05  fof(end_point_defn, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (('end$upoint'(X0,X1) <=> ('incident$uc'(X0,X1) & ! [X2] : ! [X3] : ((('part$uof'(X2,X1) & ('part$uof'(X3,X1) & ('incident$uc'(X0,X2) & 'incident$uc'(X0,X3)))) => ('part$uof'(X2,X3) | 'part$uof'(X3,X2)))))))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(inner_point_defn, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (('inner$upoint'(X0,X1) <=> ('incident$uc'(X0,X1) & ~'end$upoint'(X0,X1))))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(closed_defn, axiom, ! [X0] : ((closed(X0) <=> ~? [X1] : 'end$upoint'(X1,X0)))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(open_defn, axiom, ! [X0] : ((open(X0) <=> ? [X1] : 'end$upoint'(X1,X0)))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(c3, axiom, ! [X0] : ? [X1] : 'inner$upoint'(X1,X0)).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(start_point_defn, axiom, ! [X0] : ! [X1] : (('start$upoint'(X0,X1) <=> ('incident$uo'(X0,X1) & ! [X2] : (((X0 != X2 & 'incident$uo'(X2,X1)) => 'ordered$uby'(X1,X0,X2))))))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(o2, axiom, ! [X0] : ? [X1] : ((open(X1) & ! [X2] : (('incident$uo'(X2,X0) <=> 'incident$uc'(X2,X1)))))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(o4, axiom, ! [X0] : ? [X1] : 'start$upoint'(X1,X0)).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(theorem_4_11, conjecture, ! [X0] : ? [X1] : ? [X2] : (('ordered$uby'(X0,X1,X2) & X1 != X2))).
% 20.57/3.05  fof(negated_conjecture, negated_conjecture, ~! [X0] : ? [X1] : ? [X2] : (('ordered$uby'(X0,X1,X2) & X1 != X2)), inference(negate_conjecture, [status(cth)], [theorem_4_11])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_14, plain, ~'end$upoint'(X0,X1) | 'incident$uc'(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [end_point_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_24, plain, ~'inner$upoint'(X0,X1) | 'incident$uc'(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [inner_point_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_25, plain, ~'inner$upoint'(X0,X1) | ~'end$upoint'(X0,X1), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [inner_point_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_36, plain, ~closed(X0) | ~'end$upoint'(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [closed_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_37, plain, closed(X0) | 'end$upoint'(sK27(X0),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [closed_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_38, plain, ~open(X0) | 'end$upoint'(sK29(X0),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [open_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_42, plain, 'inner$upoint'(sK39(X0),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [c3])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_70, plain, ~'start$upoint'(X0,X1) | X2(X1,X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [start_point_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_73, plain, ~X0(X1,X2) | X2 = X3 | ~'incident$uo'(X3,X1) | 'ordered$uby'(X1,X2,X3), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [start_point_defn])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_86, plain, open(sK89(X0)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [o2])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_88, plain, 'incident$uo'(X0,X1) | ~'incident$uc'(X0,sK89(X1)), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [o2])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_98, plain, 'start$upoint'(sK101(X0),X0), inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [o4])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(c_112, plain, ~'ordered$uby'(sK115,X0,X1) | X0 = X1, inference(clausification, [status(esa)], [negated_conjecture])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d0, plain, 'Ts75'(X0,sK101(X0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_70,c_98])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d1, plain, 'incident$uc'(sK27(X0),X0) | closed(X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_14,c_37])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d2, plain, 'incident$uo'(sK27(sK89(X0)),X0) | closed(sK89(X0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_88,d1])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d3, plain, ~open(X0) | ~closed(X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_38,c_36])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d4, plain, ~closed(sK89(X0)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d3,c_86])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d5, plain, 'incident$uo'(sK27(sK89(X0)),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,d2])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d6, plain, X0 = X1 | ~'Ts75'(sK115,X0) | ~'incident$uo'(X1,sK115) | X0 = X1, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_73,c_112])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d7, plain, X0 = sK27(sK89(sK115)) | ~'Ts75'(sK115,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d5])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d8, plain, sK101(sK115) = sK27(sK89(sK115)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d7,d0])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d9, plain, 'end$upoint'(sK101(sK115),sK89(sK115)) | closed(sK89(sK115)), inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d8,c_37])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d10, plain, 'end$upoint'(sK101(sK115),sK89(sK115)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d4,d9])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d11, plain, ~'end$upoint'(sK39(X0),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_25,c_42])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d12, plain, 'incident$uc'(sK39(X0),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_24,c_42])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d13, plain, 'incident$uo'(sK39(sK89(X0)),X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [c_88,d12])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d14, plain, X0 = sK39(sK89(sK115)) | ~'Ts75'(sK115,X0), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d6,d13])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d15, plain, sK101(sK115) = sK39(sK89(sK115)), inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d14,d0])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d16, plain, ~'end$upoint'(sK101(sK115),sK89(sK115)), inference(superposition, [status(thm)], [d15,d11])).
% 20.57/3.05  cnf(d17, plain, $false, inference(resolution, [status(thm)], [d16,d10])).
% 20.57/3.05  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------