↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GEO127-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.07s 0.36s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   57 (  14 unt;  15 nHn;  48 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  118 (   8 equ;  51 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   78 (  18 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(start_point_defn_8,axiom,
    ( ~ incident_o(X3,X2)
    | ~ start_point(X1,X2)
    | ordered_by(X2,X1,X3)
    | X1 = X3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',start_point_defn_8) ).

cnf(theorem_4_12_138,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(sk26,sk25)
    | ~ ordered_by(sk25,X1,sk26) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_4_12_138) ).

cnf(o4_29,axiom,
    start_point(ax2_sk6(X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o4_29) ).

cnf(theorem_4_12_133,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | incident_o(sk26,sk25) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_4_12_133) ).

cnf(theorem_4_12_137,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(sk26,sk25)
    | ~ ordered_by(sk25,sk26,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',theorem_4_12_137) ).

cnf(inner_point_defn_21,axiom,
    ( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',inner_point_defn_21) ).

cnf(end_point_defn_13,axiom,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',end_point_defn_13) ).

cnf(open_defn_33,axiom,
    ( ~ open(X1)
    | end_point(ax0_sk7(X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',open_defn_33) ).

cnf(o2_21,axiom,
    ( ~ incident_c(X1,ax2_sk3(X2))
    | incident_o(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o2_21) ).

cnf(c3_37,axiom,
    inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',c3_37) ).

cnf(inner_point_defn_22,axiom,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-0.ax',inner_point_defn_22) ).

cnf(o2_19,axiom,
    open(ax2_sk3(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o2_19) ).

cnf(o1_18,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | incident_o(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o1_18) ).

cnf(o1_17,axiom,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | incident_o(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-2.ax',o1_17) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ incident_o(X3,X2)
    | ~ start_point(X1,X2)
    | ordered_by(X2,X1,X3)
    | X1 = X3 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[start_point_defn_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(sk26,sk25)
    | ~ ordered_by(sk25,X1,sk26) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[theorem_4_12_138]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ incident_o(X3,X2)
    | ~ start_point(X1,X2)
    | ordered_by(X2,X1,X3)
    | X1 = X3 ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    start_point(ax2_sk6(X1),X1),
    o4_29 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(sk26,sk25)
    | ~ ordered_by(sk25,X1,sk26) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | incident_o(sk26,sk25) ),
    theorem_4_12_133 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ incident_o(X2,X1)
    | ordered_by(X1,ax2_sk6(X1),X2)
    | ax2_sk6(X1) = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ordered_by(sk25,X1,sk26)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(sk26,sk25)
    | ~ ordered_by(sk25,sk26,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[theorem_4_12_137]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[end_point_defn_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ open(X1)
    | end_point(ax0_sk7(X1),X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[open_defn_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | ax2_sk6(sk25) = sk26 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(sk26,sk25)
    | ~ ordered_by(sk25,sk26,X1) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ incident_c(X1,ax2_sk3(X2))
    | incident_o(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o2_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ inner_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    inner_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    c3_37 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | incident_c(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ open(X1)
    | end_point(ax0_sk7(X1),X1) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inner_point_defn_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | start_point(sk26,sk25) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ordered_by(sk25,sk26,X1)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ incident_c(X1,ax2_sk3(X2))
    | incident_o(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    incident_c(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ open(X1)
    | incident_c(ax0_sk7(X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    open(ax2_sk3(X1)),
    o2_19 ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ end_point(X1,X2)
    | ~ inner_point(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ incident_o(X1,sk25)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | sk26 = X1 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    incident_o(ax0_sk8(ax2_sk3(X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    incident_o(ax0_sk7(ax2_sk3(X1)),X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ~ end_point(ax0_sk8(X1),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ax0_sk8(ax2_sk3(sk25)) = sk26 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | incident_o(X3,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o1_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ax0_sk7(ax2_sk3(sk25)) = sk26 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ end_point(sk26,ax2_sk3(sk25))
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | incident_o(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o1_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | incident_o(X3,X1) ),
    c_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordered_by(sk25,sk26,sk27)
    | ordered_by(sk25,sk27,sk26) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_47]),c_0_39])]),c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ( ~ ordered_by(X1,X2,X3)
    | incident_o(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    incident_o(sk26,sk25),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51]),c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordered_by(sk25,sk26,X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_53])]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordered_by(sk25,X1,sk26),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_53])]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_54]),c_0_55]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : GEO127-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.30  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 12:01:37 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.30  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.36  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 160304 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.36  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.36  % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 253s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_3 with 248s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_1 with 241s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % new_bool_3 with pid 160313 completed with status 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/0.36  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.07/0.36  % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.07/0.36  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting G-E--_207_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 253s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Starting new_bool_3 with 248s (1) cores
% 0.07/0.36  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % Proof found!
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.07/0.36  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.36  % Parsed axioms                        : 102
% 0.07/0.36  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Initial clauses                      : 102
% 0.07/0.36  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.07/0.36  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 90
% 0.07/0.36  % Processed clauses                    : 298
% 0.07/0.36  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % ...subsumed                          : 29
% 0.07/0.36  % ...remaining for further processing  : 268
% 0.07/0.36  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.07/0.36  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Backward-subsumed                    : 37
% 0.07/0.36  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.07/0.36  % Generated clauses                    : 771
% 0.07/0.36  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 733
% 0.07/0.36  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 8
% 0.07/0.36  % Paramodulations                      : 761
% 0.07/0.36  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.07/0.36  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.07/0.36  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Total rewrite steps                  : 42
% 0.07/0.36  % ...of those cached                   : 19
% 0.07/0.36  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of processed clauses  : 131
% 0.07/0.36  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 41
% 0.07/0.36  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/0.36  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.07/0.36  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 86
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 613
% 0.07/0.36  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1969
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Current number of archived clauses   : 130
% 0.07/0.36  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6716
% 0.07/0.36  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3276
% 0.07/0.36  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 74
% 0.07/0.36  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 320
% 0.07/0.36  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.07/0.36  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.07/0.36  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.07/0.36  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 14976
% 0.07/0.36  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 250
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.36  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.07/0.36  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Maximum resident set size: 3720 pages
% 0.07/0.36  
% 0.07/0.36  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/0.36  % User time                : 0.079 s
% 0.07/0.36  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Total time               : 0.097 s
% 0.07/0.36  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.07/0.36  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------