%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO146+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 5.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 3 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(symmetry_of_at_the_same_time,axiom,
! [X14,X15] :
( once(at_the_same_time(X14,X15))
<=> once(at_the_same_time(X15,X14)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+3.ax',symmetry_of_at_the_same_time) ).
fof(connect_defn,axiom,
! [X12,X13,X3] :
( connect(X12,X13,X3)
<=> once(at_the_same_time(at(X12,X3),at(X13,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004+3.ax',connect_defn) ).
fof(t12,conjecture,
! [X12,X13,X3] :
( connect(X12,X13,X3)
<=> connect(X13,X12,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X26,X27] :
( ( once(at_the_same_time(X26,X27))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(X27,X26)) )
& ( once(at_the_same_time(X27,X26))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(X26,X27)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_at_the_same_time])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X23,X24,X25] :
( ( connect(X23,X24,X25)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X23,X25),at(X24,X25))) )
& ( once(at_the_same_time(at(X23,X25),at(X24,X25)))
| ~ connect(X23,X24,X25) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[connect_defn])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X12,X13,X3] :
( connect(X12,X13,X3)
<=> connect(X13,X12,X3) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t12]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
| connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ connect(X3,X1,X2)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ( connect(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
| connect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) )
& ( ~ connect(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ connect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ connect(X2,X1,X3)
| connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( connect(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
| connect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ connect(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ connect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
connect(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ connect(esk2_0,esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO146+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 12:29:53 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 949690 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.45 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 949693 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.45 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.45 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/5.45
% 0.14/5.45 % Proof found!
% 0.14/5.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/5.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/5.45 % Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.14/5.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 25
% 0.14/5.45 % Initial clauses : 20
% 0.14/5.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20
% 0.14/5.45 % Processed clauses : 213
% 0.14/5.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % ...subsumed : 149
% 0.14/5.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 63
% 0.14/5.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % Generated clauses : 357
% 0.14/5.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 333
% 0.14/5.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % Paramodulations : 355
% 0.14/5.45 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.14/5.45 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 61
% 0.14/5.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.14/5.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/5.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 56
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 140
% 0.14/5.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 302
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1101
% 0.14/5.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1064
% 0.14/5.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 151
% 0.14/5.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.14/5.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.14/5.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.14/5.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5282
% 0.14/5.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 549
% 0.14/5.45
% 0.14/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.45 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/5.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages
% 0.14/5.45
% 0.14/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.45 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.14/5.45 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/5.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------