↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : GEO146-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   19 (   3 unt;   2 nHn;  19 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   35 (   0 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3,axiom,
    ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
    | once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3) ).

cnf(connect_defn_1,axiom,
    ( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
    | once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',connect_defn_1) ).

cnf(connect_defn_2,axiom,
    ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
    | connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',connect_defn_2) ).

cnf(t12_159,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29)
    | ~ connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_159) ).

cnf(t12_156,negated_conjecture,
    ( connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)
    | connect(sk27,sk28,sk29) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_156) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
    | once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
    | once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[connect_defn_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
    | connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[connect_defn_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
    | once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
    | once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
    | connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ connect(X3,X1,X2)
    | once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29)
    | ~ connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t12_159]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ connect(X2,X1,X3)
    | connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( connect(sk28,sk27,sk29)
    | connect(sk27,sk28,sk29) ),
    t12_156 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29)
    | ~ connect(sk28,sk27,sk29) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    connect(sk28,sk27,sk29),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ connect(sk27,sk28,sk29),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO146-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.54  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.54  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.54  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.54  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.54  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.54  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.54  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.54  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 12:34:42 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.54  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.54  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.59  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.59  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.62  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % new_bool_3 with pid 3626633 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.62  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.62  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3626637 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.62  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.62  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.62  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.62  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.62  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.62  
% 0.14/0.62  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.62  % Parsed axioms                        : 114
% 0.14/0.62  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 90
% 0.14/0.62  % Initial clauses                      : 24
% 0.14/0.62  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.14/0.62  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 22
% 0.14/0.62  % Processed clauses                    : 190
% 0.14/0.62  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % ...subsumed                          : 130
% 0.14/0.62  % ...remaining for further processing  : 59
% 0.14/0.62  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.14/0.62  % Generated clauses                    : 311
% 0.14/0.62  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 286
% 0.14/0.62  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.14/0.62  % Paramodulations                      : 311
% 0.14/0.62  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.14/0.62  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.14/0.62  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of processed clauses  : 57
% 0.14/0.62  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.14/0.62  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.62  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.14/0.62  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 53
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 118
% 0.14/0.62  % ...number of literals in the above   : 242
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.14/0.62  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1079
% 0.14/0.62  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1007
% 0.14/0.62  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 132
% 0.14/0.62  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.14/0.62  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.14/0.62  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.62  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4512
% 0.14/0.62  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 509
% 0.14/0.62  
% 0.14/0.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.62  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.62  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Maximum resident set size: 3740 pages
% 0.14/0.62  
% 0.14/0.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.62  % User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.62  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Total time               : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------