%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO147-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:18 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.38s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 0 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(t13_157,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk29))
| ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk28)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_157) ).
cnf(at_on_trajectory_10,axiom,
( ~ once(at(X1,X2))
| incident_o(X2,trajectory_of(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',at_on_trajectory_10) ).
cnf(conjunction_at_the_same_time_8,axiom,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',conjunction_at_the_same_time_8) ).
cnf(connect_defn_1,axiom,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',connect_defn_1) ).
cnf(conjunction_at_the_same_time_9,axiom,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',conjunction_at_the_same_time_9) ).
cnf(t13_156,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk29,sk27),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t13_156) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk29))
| ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk28)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t13_157]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ once(at(X1,X2))
| incident_o(X2,trajectory_of(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[at_on_trajectory_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conjunction_at_the_same_time_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[connect_defn_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk29))
| ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk28)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ once(at(X1,X2))
| incident_o(X2,trajectory_of(X1)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conjunction_at_the_same_time_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ incident_o(sk27,trajectory_of(sk29))
| ~ once(at(sk28,sk27)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ connect(X1,X3,X2)
| once(at(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk29,sk27),
t13_156 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(X2) ),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( ~ once(at(sk29,sk27))
| ~ once(at(sk28,sk27)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
once(at(sk28,sk27)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ connect(X3,X1,X2)
| once(at(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ once(at(sk29,sk27)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : GEO147-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.47 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.47 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 12:32:09 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.56 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.56 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.38/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.38/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % new_bool_3 with pid 3620310 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.38/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.38/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.62 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3620313 completed with status 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.38/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.38/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.38/0.62 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.38/0.62 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.38/0.62 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.38/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.38/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.38/0.62
% 0.38/0.62 % Proof found!
% 0.38/0.62 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.38/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.38/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 112
% 0.38/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 90
% 0.38/0.62 % Initial clauses : 22
% 0.38/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.38/0.62 % Processed clauses : 28
% 0.38/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.38/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.38/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.38/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.38/0.62 % Generated clauses : 23
% 0.38/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 20
% 0.38/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Paramodulations : 23
% 0.38/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.38/0.62 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.38/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.38/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.38/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.38/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.38/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.38/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 36
% 0.38/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.38/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 49
% 0.38/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
% 0.38/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.38/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.38/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.38/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.38/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.38/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1715
% 0.38/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 509
% 0.38/0.62
% 0.38/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.62 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.38/0.62 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.38/0.62 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.38/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 3740 pages
% 0.38/0.62
% 0.38/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.38/0.62 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.38/0.62 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.38/0.62 % Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.38/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.38/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------