%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO148-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:19 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3,axiom,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3) ).
cnf(connect_defn_1,axiom,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',connect_defn_1) ).
cnf(homogeneous_behaviour_13,axiom,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X6,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X5),at(X3,X6)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',homogeneous_behaviour_13) ).
cnf(connect_defn_2,axiom,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
| connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO004-3.ax',connect_defn_2) ).
cnf(t14_159,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk28,sk30),at(sk29,sk31))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_159) ).
cnf(t14_156,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk29,sk27),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_156) ).
cnf(t14_158,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),sk27,sk30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_158) ).
cnf(t14_157,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,sk27),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_157) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symmetry_of_at_the_same_time_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[connect_defn_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X6,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X5),at(X3,X6)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[homogeneous_behaviour_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
| connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[connect_defn_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(X1,X2))
| once(at_the_same_time(X2,X1)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ connect(X1,X2,X3)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X3),at(X2,X3))) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X6,X4)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X5),at(X3,X6)))
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4))) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk28,sk30),at(sk29,sk31))),
t14_159 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2)))
| connect(X1,X3,X2) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ connect(X3,X1,X2)
| once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X2))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X1),X2,X5)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(X3),X5,X4)
| ~ connect(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ once(at_the_same_time(at(X1,X2),at(X3,X4))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
once(at_the_same_time(at(sk29,sk31),at(sk28,sk30))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ connect(X2,X1,X3)
| connect(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk28,sk29,sk27),
t14_156 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,X1)
| ~ ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),X1,sk30)
| ~ connect(sk29,sk28,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk28),sk27,sk30),
t14_158 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
connect(sk29,sk28,sk27),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
ordered_by(trajectory_of(sk29),sk31,sk27),
t14_157 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : GEO148-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.45 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.20/0.45 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 12:29:49 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.60 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % new_bool_1 with pid 2892079 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.23/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.60 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2892085 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.60 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.60 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.60 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.60 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60 % partial match(1): FGHNF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.60 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.60 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.60 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.60
% 0.23/0.60 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.60 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.60 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.60 % Parsed axioms : 114
% 0.23/0.60 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 96
% 0.23/0.60 % Initial clauses : 18
% 0.23/0.60 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Initial clauses in saturation : 18
% 0.23/0.60 % Processed clauses : 924
% 0.23/0.60 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % ...subsumed : 783
% 0.23/0.60 % ...remaining for further processing : 141
% 0.23/0.60 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Generated clauses : 2065
% 0.23/0.60 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1955
% 0.23/0.60 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Paramodulations : 2065
% 0.23/0.60 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Total rewrite steps : 67
% 0.23/0.60 % ...of those cached : 50
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.60 % Current number of processed clauses : 141
% 0.23/0.60 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 22
% 0.23/0.60 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.60 % Non-unit-clauses : 115
% 0.23/0.60 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1049
% 0.23/0.60 % ...number of literals in the above : 2115
% 0.23/0.60 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7996
% 0.23/0.60 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7829
% 0.23/0.60 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 776
% 0.23/0.60 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.23/0.60 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % BW rewrite match attempts : 41
% 0.23/0.60 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.60 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22890
% 0.23/0.60 % Search garbage collected termcells : 519
% 0.23/0.60
% 0.23/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.60 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.23/0.60 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.60 % Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.23/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 3740 pages
% 0.23/0.60
% 0.23/0.60 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.60 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.23/0.60 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.60 % Total time : 0.037 s
% 0.23/0.60 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.60 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------