↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO170+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:19:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.44s 1.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   94 (  38   ~;  34   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   66 (   0 sgn  47   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & incident_point_and_line(X1,X3)
        & incident_point_and_line(X2,X3) )
     => equal_lines(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(ax2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( equal_lines(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',ax2) ).

fof(apart1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart1) ).

fof(apart4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        | distinct_points(X2,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',apart4) ).

fof(a4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+6.ax',a4) ).

fof(cu1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & distinct_lines(X4,X5) )
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
        | apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
        | apart_point_and_line(X2,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',cu1) ).

fof(ci1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(ci2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
          & incident_point_and_line(X1,X3)
          & incident_point_and_line(X2,X3) )
       => equal_lines(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( equal_lines(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax2]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    & incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & ~ equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X168,X169] :
      ( ( ~ equal_lines(X168,X169)
        | ~ distinct_lines(X168,X169) )
      & ( distinct_lines(X168,X169)
        | equal_lines(X168,X169) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[apart1]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X98,X99,X100] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X98,X99)
      | distinct_points(X98,X100)
      | distinct_points(X99,X100) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[apart4])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    <=> ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a4]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X115,X116,X117,X118] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X115,X116)
      | ~ distinct_lines(X117,X118)
      | apart_point_and_line(X115,X117)
      | apart_point_and_line(X115,X118)
      | apart_point_and_line(X116,X117)
      | apart_point_and_line(X116,X118) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cu1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X1,X2)
    | equal_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X95] : ~ distinct_points(X95,X95),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
    | distinct_points(X2,X3)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X172,X173] :
      ( ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X172,X173)
        | ~ apart_point_and_line(X172,X173) )
      & ( apart_point_and_line(X172,X173)
        | incident_point_and_line(X172,X173) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ distinct_lines(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_points(esk2_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ incident_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    incident_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    incident_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2]) ).

fof(c_0_31,plain,
    ! [X107,X108] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X107,X108)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X107,line_connecting(X107,X108)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,esk3_0)
    | apart_point_and_line(X2,esk3_0)
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk2_0,esk1_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X109,X110] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X109,X110)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X110,line_connecting(X109,X110)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : GEO170+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.31  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:44:47 EDT 2026
% 0.12/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.32  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.44/1.80  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.44/1.80  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.44/1.80  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.44/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.54/1.80  % Total time : 1.370s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------