%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : GEO173+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 08:43:52 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 0.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 111 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 109 ( 34 ~; 49 |; 21 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 56 ( 0 sgn 35 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpHLeXep/sel_GEO173+2.p_1',con1) ).
fof(2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& distinct_lines(X4,X5) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X5) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpHLeXep/sel_GEO173+2.p_1',cu1) ).
fof(6,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
file('/tmp/tmpHLeXep/sel_GEO173+2.p_1',apart1) ).
fof(12,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpHLeXep/sel_GEO173+2.p_1',con) ).
fof(13,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[12]) ).
fof(14,plain,
! [X1] : ~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[6,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(17,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
| ( distinct_points(X3,X1)
& distinct_points(X3,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
fof(18,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ distinct_points(X4,X5)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
| ( distinct_points(X6,X4)
& distinct_points(X6,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
fof(19,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( distinct_points(X6,X4)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X5) )
& ( distinct_points(X6,X5)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,line_connecting(X4,X5))
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
cnf(20,plain,
( distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
cnf(21,plain,
( distinct_points(X3,X1)
| ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
fof(22,plain,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
| ~ distinct_lines(X4,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,X5) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(23,plain,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( ~ distinct_points(X6,X7)
| ~ distinct_lines(X8,X9)
| apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)
| apart_point_and_line(X6,X9)
| apart_point_and_line(X7,X8)
| apart_point_and_line(X7,X9) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
cnf(24,plain,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X4,X3)
| ~ distinct_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ distinct_points(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
fof(34,plain,
! [X2] : ~ distinct_points(X2,X2),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
cnf(35,plain,
~ distinct_points(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[34]) ).
fof(49,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
fof(50,negated_conjecture,
? [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( distinct_points(X6,X7)
& convergent_lines(X8,X9)
& distinct_lines(X8,line_connecting(X6,X7))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X6,X8)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(X7,X8) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[49]) ).
fof(51,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& ~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
& ~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[50]) ).
cnf(52,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
cnf(53,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
cnf(54,negated_conjecture,
distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
cnf(56,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
cnf(61,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(X1,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(X2,esk3_0)
| ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[24,54,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(101,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[61,56,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(105,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[101,53,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(106,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[105,52,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(114,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[21,106,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(118,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[114,56,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(119,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk1_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[118,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(120,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[119,35,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(123,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[20,120,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(126,negated_conjecture,
( distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0)
| $false ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[123,56,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(127,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk2_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[126,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(128,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[127,35,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(129,negated_conjecture,
$false,
128,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO173+2.p
% --creating new selector for [GEO008+0.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpHLeXep/sel_GEO173+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem GEO173+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO173+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/GEO/GEO173+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------