↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.28  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.28  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 09:48:23 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.46  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.70/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.70/0.80  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.70/0.80  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.70/0.80  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.70/0.80  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.70/0.80  
% 0.70/0.80  % Result      :Theorem 0.300000s
% 0.70/0.80  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.300000s
% 0.70/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  % File     : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.70/0.80  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.70/0.80  % Problem  : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 0.70/0.80  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Reduced > Especial.
% 0.70/0.80  % English  : If two points are distinct and a line U is apart from at least
% 0.70/0.80  %            one of these points, then this line is distinct from the line
% 0.70/0.80  %            connecting these points
% 0.70/0.80  
% 0.70/0.80  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.70/0.80  %          : [Li97]  Li (1997), Replacing the Axioms for Connecting Lines a
% 0.70/0.80  %          : [Li98]  Li (1998), A Shorter and Intuitive Axiom to Replace th
% 0.70/0.80  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.70/0.80  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 0.70/0.80  % Names    :
% 0.70/0.80  
% 0.70/0.80  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.70/0.80  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.04 v5.3.0, 0.13 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 0.70/0.80  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   3 avg)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Number of connectives :   29 (   3   ~;  10   |;   4   &)
% 0.70/0.80  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.70/0.80  %            Number of variables   :   34 (  34   !;   0   ?)
% 0.70/0.80  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.70/0.80  
% 0.70/0.80  % Comments :  Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 0.70/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  include('Axioms/GEO008+0.ax').
% 0.70/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.70/0.80      ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 0.70/0.80        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.70/0.80          & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 0.70/0.80          & ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
% 0.70/0.80            | apart_point_and_line(Y,U) ) )
% 0.70/0.80       => distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ).
% 0.70/0.80  
% 0.70/0.80  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  % Proof found
% 0.70/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.70/0.80  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.70/0.80  %ClaNum:18(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.70/0.80  %VarNum:80(SingletonVarNum:36)
% 0.70/0.80  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.70/0.80  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.70/0.80  %SharedTerms:10
% 0.70/0.80  %goalClause: 1 2 6 7
% 0.70/0.80  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.70/0.80  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.70/0.80  [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 0.70/0.80  [6]~P4(a3,f5(a1,a2))
% 0.70/0.80  [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 0.70/0.80  [4]~P4(x41,x41)
% 0.70/0.80  [5]~P2(x51,x51)
% 0.70/0.80  [7]P3(a1,a3)+P3(a2,a3)
% 0.70/0.80  [8]~P2(x81,x82)+P4(x81,x82)
% 0.70/0.80  [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P1(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 0.70/0.80  [10]~P3(x101,x103)+P1(x101,x102)+P3(x102,x103)
% 0.70/0.80  [11]~P4(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x113,x112)
% 0.70/0.80  [12]~P3(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P3(x123,x122)
% 0.70/0.80  [13]~P2(x133,x131)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x132)
% 0.70/0.80  [14]~P2(x142,x143)+~P3(x141,x143)+P1(x141,f6(x142,x143))
% 0.70/0.80  [15]~P2(x152,x153)+~P3(x151,x152)+P1(x151,f6(x152,x153))
% 0.70/0.80  [16]P1(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x162)+~P3(x161,f5(x163,x162))
% 0.70/0.80  [17]P1(x171,x172)+~P1(x172,x173)+~P3(x171,f5(x172,x173))
% 0.70/0.80  [18]P3(x184,x183)+~P1(x184,x181)+~P4(x183,x182)+P3(x181,x182)+P3(x181,x183)+P3(x184,x182)
% 0.70/0.80  %EqnAxiom
% 0.70/0.80  
% 0.70/0.80  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.80  cnf(105,plain,
% 0.70/0.80     (P3(a1,f5(a1,a2))+P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.70/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,7,12])).
% 0.70/0.80  cnf(106,plain,
% 0.70/0.80     (P3(a2,a3)),
% 0.70/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,105,17])).
% 0.70/0.80  cnf(195,plain,
% 0.70/0.80     (~P3(a2,f5(a1,a2))),
% 0.70/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,9,16])).
% 0.70/0.80  cnf(196,plain,
% 0.70/0.80     ($false),
% 0.70/0.80     inference(scs_inference,[],[106,6,195,12]),
% 0.70/0.80     ['proof']).
% 0.70/0.80  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.70/0.80  % Total time :0.300000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------