%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:21:51 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 6.72s 1.65s % Output : Proof 8.21s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO174+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 23:37:16 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.56/0.60 ________ _____ % 0.56/0.60 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.56/0.60 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.56/0.60 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.56/0.60 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.56/0.60 % 0.56/0.60 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.56/0.60 (2023-06-19) % 0.56/0.60 % 0.56/0.60 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.56/0.60 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.56/0.60 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.56/0.60 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.56/0.60 % 0.56/0.60 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.56/0.60 % 0.56/0.60 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.56/0.61 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.56/0.62 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.56/0.62 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.56/0.62 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.56/0.62 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.56/0.62 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.56/0.62 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 0.56/0.62 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 2.66/1.07 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.66/1.07 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.66/1.11 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.66/1.11 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.66/1.11 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.66/1.11 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.66/1.11 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 4.07/1.31 Prover 5: Proving ... % 4.44/1.33 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.44/1.35 Prover 2: Proving ... % 4.72/1.36 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.72/1.39 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.56/1.51 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.56/1.52 Prover 0: Proving ... % 6.72/1.64 Prover 6: proved (1020ms) % 6.72/1.65 % 6.72/1.65 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 6.72/1.65 % 6.72/1.66 Prover 3: stopped % 6.72/1.66 Prover 0: stopped % 6.72/1.66 Prover 5: stopped % 6.72/1.66 Prover 2: stopped % 6.72/1.66 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 6.72/1.66 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 6.72/1.66 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 6.72/1.66 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 6.72/1.66 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 6.97/1.70 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 6.97/1.70 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 6.97/1.71 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 6.97/1.72 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 6.97/1.73 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 7.57/1.75 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.57/1.75 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.57/1.77 Prover 1: Found proof (size 61) % 7.57/1.77 Prover 1: proved (1148ms) % 7.57/1.77 Prover 4: stopped % 7.57/1.77 Prover 7: stopped % 7.57/1.77 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.57/1.77 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.82/1.78 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.82/1.78 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.82/1.78 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 7.82/1.78 Prover 10: stopped % 7.82/1.78 Prover 8: stopped % 7.82/1.78 Prover 11: stopped % 7.82/1.78 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.82/1.79 Prover 13: stopped % 7.82/1.79 % 7.82/1.79 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 7.82/1.79 % 7.82/1.80 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 7.82/1.80 Assumptions after simplification: % 7.82/1.80 --------------------------------- % 7.82/1.80 % 7.82/1.80 (apart1) % 7.82/1.83 ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (distinct_points(v0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0)) % 7.82/1.83 % 7.82/1.83 (apart5) % 7.82/1.83 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ % 7.82/1.83 (distinct_lines(v0, v2) = v3) | ~ (distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v2) % 7.82/1.83 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | distinct_lines(v1, v2) = 0) % 7.82/1.83 % 7.82/1.83 (ceq2) % 8.09/1.83 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0 | ~ % 8.09/1.83 (apart_point_and_line(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ (distinct_lines(v1, v2) = v3) | ~ % 8.09/1.83 $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = 0) % 8.09/1.83 % 8.09/1.83 (ceq3) % 8.09/1.83 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (convergent_lines(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | % 8.09/1.83 ~ $i(v0) | distinct_lines(v0, v1) = 0) % 8.09/1.83 % 8.09/1.83 (con) % 8.09/1.83 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: % 8.09/1.83 any] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: int] : ( ~ (v7 = 0) & line_connecting(v0, v1) = % 8.09/1.83 v6 & apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v5 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & % 8.09/1.83 convergent_lines(v2, v3) = 0 & distinct_lines(v2, v6) = v7 & % 8.09/1.83 distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v6) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & % 8.09/1.83 (v5 = 0 | v4 = 0)) % 8.09/1.83 % 8.09/1.83 (con1) % 8.09/1.84 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ % 8.09/1.84 (line_connecting(v0, v1) = v3) | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v2, v3) = 0) | ~ % 8.09/1.84 $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] % 8.09/1.84 : (distinct_points(v2, v1) = v6 & distinct_points(v2, v0) = v5 & % 8.09/1.84 distinct_points(v0, v1) = v4 & ( ~ (v4 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) % 8.09/1.84 % 8.09/1.84 (cu1) % 8.09/1.84 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ % 8.09/1.84 (distinct_lines(v2, v3) = 0) | ~ (distinct_points(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v3) % 8.09/1.84 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: % 8.09/1.84 any] : ? [v7: any] : (apart_point_and_line(v1, v3) = v7 & % 8.09/1.84 apart_point_and_line(v1, v2) = v6 & apart_point_and_line(v0, v3) = v5 & % 8.09/1.84 apart_point_and_line(v0, v2) = v4 & (v7 = 0 | v6 = 0 | v5 = 0 | v4 = 0))) % 8.09/1.84 % 8.09/1.84 (function-axioms) % 8.09/1.85 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 8.09/1.85 (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (intersection_point(v3, v2) = v0)) & % 8.09/1.85 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 8.09/1.85 (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (line_connecting(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! % 8.09/1.85 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: % 8.09/1.85 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 8.09/1.85 (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: % 8.09/1.85 MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ % 8.09/1.85 (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (convergent_lines(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! % 8.09/1.85 [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: % 8.09/1.85 $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (distinct_lines(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (distinct_lines(v3, % 8.09/1.85 v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : % 8.09/1.85 ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 8.09/1.85 (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) % 8.09/1.85 % 8.09/1.85 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 8.09/1.85 -------------------------------------------- % 8.09/1.85 apart2, apart3, apart4, apart6, ceq1, con2 % 8.09/1.85 % 8.09/1.85 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 8.09/1.85 --------------------------------- % 8.09/1.85 % 8.09/1.85 Begin of proof % 8.09/1.85 | % 8.09/1.85 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies: % 8.21/1.85 | (1) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : % 8.21/1.85 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 8.21/1.85 | (distinct_points(v3, v2) = v0)) % 8.21/1.85 | (2) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : % 8.21/1.85 | ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ % 8.21/1.85 | (apart_point_and_line(v3, v2) = v0)) % 8.21/1.85 | % 8.21/1.85 | DELTA: instantiating (con) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1, all_15_2, % 8.21/1.85 | all_15_3, all_15_4, all_15_5, all_15_6, all_15_7 gives: % 8.21/1.85 | (3) ~ (all_15_0 = 0) & line_connecting(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_15_1 & % 8.21/1.85 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_5) = all_15_2 & % 8.21/1.85 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_5) = all_15_3 & % 8.21/1.85 | convergent_lines(all_15_5, all_15_4) = 0 & distinct_lines(all_15_5, % 8.21/1.85 | all_15_1) = all_15_0 & distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = 0 & % 8.21/1.85 | $i(all_15_1) & $i(all_15_4) & $i(all_15_5) & $i(all_15_6) & % 8.21/1.85 | $i(all_15_7) & (all_15_2 = 0 | all_15_3 = 0) % 8.21/1.85 | % 8.21/1.85 | ALPHA: (3) implies: % 8.21/1.86 | (4) ~ (all_15_0 = 0) % 8.21/1.86 | (5) $i(all_15_7) % 8.21/1.86 | (6) $i(all_15_6) % 8.21/1.86 | (7) $i(all_15_5) % 8.21/1.86 | (8) $i(all_15_4) % 8.21/1.86 | (9) $i(all_15_1) % 8.21/1.86 | (10) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = 0 % 8.21/1.86 | (11) distinct_lines(all_15_5, all_15_1) = all_15_0 % 8.21/1.86 | (12) convergent_lines(all_15_5, all_15_4) = 0 % 8.21/1.86 | (13) apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_5) = all_15_3 % 8.21/1.86 | (14) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_5) = all_15_2 % 8.21/1.86 | (15) line_connecting(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_15_1 % 8.21/1.86 | (16) all_15_2 = 0 | all_15_3 = 0 % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ceq3) with all_15_5, all_15_4, simplifying with % 8.21/1.86 | (7), (8), (12) gives: % 8.21/1.86 | (17) distinct_lines(all_15_5, all_15_4) = 0 % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (apart5) with all_15_5, all_15_4, all_15_1, % 8.21/1.86 | all_15_0, simplifying with (7), (8), (9), (11), (17) gives: % 8.21/1.86 | (18) all_15_0 = 0 | distinct_lines(all_15_4, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (cu1) with all_15_7, all_15_6, all_15_5, all_15_4, % 8.21/1.86 | simplifying with (5), (6), (7), (8), (10), (17) gives: % 8.21/1.86 | (19) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : % 8.21/1.86 | (apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_4) = v3 & % 8.21/1.86 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_5) = v2 & % 8.21/1.86 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_4) = v1 & % 8.21/1.86 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_5) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | % 8.21/1.86 | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0)) % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_28_0, all_28_1, all_28_2, % 8.21/1.86 | all_28_3 gives: % 8.21/1.86 | (20) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_4) = all_28_0 & % 8.21/1.86 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_5) = all_28_1 & % 8.21/1.86 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_4) = all_28_2 & % 8.21/1.86 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_5) = all_28_3 & (all_28_0 = 0 | % 8.21/1.86 | all_28_1 = 0 | all_28_2 = 0 | all_28_3 = 0) % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | ALPHA: (20) implies: % 8.21/1.86 | (21) apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_5) = all_28_3 % 8.21/1.86 | (22) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_5) = all_28_1 % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | BETA: splitting (18) gives: % 8.21/1.86 | % 8.21/1.86 | Case 1: % 8.21/1.86 | | % 8.21/1.86 | | (23) distinct_lines(all_15_4, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.86 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_15_3, all_28_3, all_15_5, all_15_7, % 8.21/1.87 | | simplifying with (13), (21) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | (24) all_28_3 = all_15_3 % 8.21/1.87 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_15_2, all_28_1, all_15_5, all_15_6, % 8.21/1.87 | | simplifying with (14), (22) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | (25) all_28_1 = all_15_2 % 8.21/1.87 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (cu1) with all_15_7, all_15_6, all_15_4, % 8.21/1.87 | | all_15_1, simplifying with (5), (6), (8), (9), (10), (23) % 8.21/1.87 | | gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | (26) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] : % 8.21/1.87 | | (apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_1) = v3 & % 8.21/1.87 | | apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_4) = v2 & % 8.21/1.87 | | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_1) = v1 & % 8.21/1.87 | | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_4) = v0 & (v3 = 0 | v2 = 0 | % 8.21/1.87 | | v1 = 0 | v0 = 0)) % 8.21/1.87 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | DELTA: instantiating (26) with fresh symbols all_43_0, all_43_1, all_43_2, % 8.21/1.87 | | all_43_3 gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | (27) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_1) = all_43_0 & % 8.21/1.87 | | apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_4) = all_43_1 & % 8.21/1.87 | | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_1) = all_43_2 & % 8.21/1.87 | | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_4) = all_43_3 & (all_43_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | all_43_1 = 0 | all_43_2 = 0 | all_43_3 = 0) % 8.21/1.87 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | ALPHA: (27) implies: % 8.21/1.87 | | (28) apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_1) = all_43_2 % 8.21/1.87 | | (29) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_1) = all_43_0 % 8.21/1.87 | | (30) all_43_0 = 0 | all_43_1 = 0 | all_43_2 = 0 | all_43_3 = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | BETA: splitting (16) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | % 8.21/1.87 | | Case 1: % 8.21/1.87 | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | (31) all_15_2 = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | REDUCE: (14), (31) imply: % 8.21/1.87 | | | (32) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_5) = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ceq2) with all_15_6, all_15_5, all_15_1, % 8.21/1.87 | | | all_15_0, simplifying with (6), (7), (9), (11), (32) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | | (33) all_15_0 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | BETA: splitting (30) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | Case 1: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (34) all_43_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | REDUCE: (29), (34) imply: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (35) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (con1) with all_15_7, all_15_6, all_15_6, % 8.21/1.87 | | | | all_15_1, simplifying with (5), (6), (15), (35) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (36) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (distinct_points(all_15_6, all_15_6) = v2 & % 8.21/1.87 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_6, all_15_7) = v1 & % 8.21/1.87 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 % 8.21/1.87 | | | | = 0 & v1 = 0))) % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbols all_68_0, all_68_1, % 8.21/1.87 | | | | all_68_2 gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (37) distinct_points(all_15_6, all_15_6) = all_68_0 & % 8.21/1.87 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_6, all_15_7) = all_68_1 & % 8.21/1.87 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_68_2 & ( ~ (all_68_2 = % 8.21/1.87 | | | | 0) | (all_68_0 = 0 & all_68_1 = 0)) % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | ALPHA: (37) implies: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (38) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_68_2 % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (39) distinct_points(all_15_6, all_15_6) = all_68_0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (40) ~ (all_68_2 = 0) | (all_68_0 = 0 & all_68_1 = 0) % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, all_68_2, all_15_6, all_15_7, % 8.21/1.87 | | | | simplifying with (10), (38) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | (41) all_68_2 = 0 % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | BETA: splitting (40) gives: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | % 8.21/1.87 | | | | Case 1: % 8.21/1.87 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (42) ~ (all_68_2 = 0) % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | REDUCE: (41), (42) imply: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (43) $false % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | CLOSE: (43) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | Case 2: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (44) all_68_0 = 0 & all_68_1 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | ALPHA: (44) implies: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (45) all_68_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | REDUCE: (39), (45) imply: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (46) distinct_points(all_15_6, all_15_6) = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (apart1) with all_15_6, simplifying with % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (6), (46) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (47) $false % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | CLOSE: (47) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | End of split % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | Case 2: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (48) ~ (all_43_0 = 0) % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | BETA: splitting (33) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | Case 1: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (49) apart_point_and_line(all_15_6, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_43_0, 0, all_15_1, all_15_6, % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | simplifying with (29), (49) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (50) all_43_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | REDUCE: (48), (50) imply: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (51) $false % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | CLOSE: (51) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | Case 2: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (52) all_15_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | REDUCE: (4), (52) imply: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | (53) $false % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.88 | | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | End of split % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | End of split % 8.21/1.88 | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | Case 2: % 8.21/1.88 | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | (54) all_15_3 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | REDUCE: (13), (54) imply: % 8.21/1.88 | | | (55) apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_5) = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ceq2) with all_15_7, all_15_5, all_15_1, % 8.21/1.88 | | | all_15_0, simplifying with (5), (7), (9), (11), (55) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | (56) all_15_0 = 0 | apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | BETA: splitting (56) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | Case 1: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (57) apart_point_and_line(all_15_7, all_15_1) = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_43_2, 0, all_15_1, all_15_7, % 8.21/1.88 | | | | simplifying with (28), (57) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (58) all_43_2 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (con1) with all_15_7, all_15_6, all_15_7, % 8.21/1.88 | | | | all_15_1, simplifying with (5), (6), (15), (57) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (59) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: any] : % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = v2 & % 8.21/1.88 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = v0 & % 8.21/1.88 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_7) = v1 & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v2 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | = 0 & v1 = 0))) % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | DELTA: instantiating (59) with fresh symbols all_76_0, all_76_1, % 8.21/1.88 | | | | all_76_2 gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (60) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_76_0 & % 8.21/1.88 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_76_2 & % 8.21/1.88 | | | | distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_7) = all_76_1 & ( ~ (all_76_2 = % 8.21/1.88 | | | | 0) | (all_76_0 = 0 & all_76_1 = 0)) % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | ALPHA: (60) implies: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (61) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_7) = all_76_1 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (62) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_76_2 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (63) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_6) = all_76_0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (64) ~ (all_76_2 = 0) | (all_76_0 = 0 & all_76_1 = 0) % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, all_76_0, all_15_6, all_15_7, % 8.21/1.88 | | | | simplifying with (10), (63) gives: % 8.21/1.88 | | | | (65) all_76_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.88 | | | | % 8.21/1.88 | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_76_2, all_76_0, all_15_6, % 8.21/1.88 | | | | all_15_7, simplifying with (62), (63) gives: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | (66) all_76_0 = all_76_2 % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | COMBINE_EQS: (65), (66) imply: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | (67) all_76_2 = 0 % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | BETA: splitting (64) gives: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | Case 1: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (68) ~ (all_76_2 = 0) % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | REDUCE: (67), (68) imply: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (69) $false % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | CLOSE: (69) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | Case 2: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (70) all_76_0 = 0 & all_76_1 = 0 % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | ALPHA: (70) implies: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (71) all_76_1 = 0 % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | REDUCE: (61), (71) imply: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (72) distinct_points(all_15_7, all_15_7) = 0 % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (apart1) with all_15_7, simplifying with % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (5), (72) gives: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | (73) $false % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | CLOSE: (73) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.89 | | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | End of split % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | Case 2: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | (74) all_15_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | REDUCE: (4), (74) imply: % 8.21/1.89 | | | | (75) $false % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | | CLOSE: (75) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.89 | | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | | End of split % 8.21/1.89 | | | % 8.21/1.89 | | End of split % 8.21/1.89 | | % 8.21/1.89 | Case 2: % 8.21/1.89 | | % 8.21/1.89 | | (76) all_15_0 = 0 % 8.21/1.89 | | % 8.21/1.89 | | REDUCE: (4), (76) imply: % 8.21/1.89 | | (77) $false % 8.21/1.89 | | % 8.21/1.89 | | CLOSE: (77) is inconsistent. % 8.21/1.89 | | % 8.21/1.89 | End of split % 8.21/1.89 | % 8.21/1.89 End of proof % 8.21/1.89 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 8.21/1.89 % 8.21/1.89 1286ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------