↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO174+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:06 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.45s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  12 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   78 (  31   ~;  29   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   0 sgn  41   !;   8   ?;   9   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
        | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(f36,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
          | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
        & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
     => distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
            | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
          & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f36]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f45,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
        | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2) )
      & convergent_lines(X2,X3)
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & ~ distinct_lines(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ( ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) )
    & convergent_lines(sK2,sK3)
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    & ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2),skolemize(X3,sK3)],[f77]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f91,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X0)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X0)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X2)
      | distinct_lines(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91]) ).

tcf(c_85,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_lines(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

tcf(c_86,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f117]) ).

tcf(c_88,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).

tcf(c_453,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = line_connecting(sK0,sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_454,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,sK2)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_88]) ).

tcf(c_456,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_86]) ).

tcf(c_457,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_lines(sK2,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_453]) ).

tcf(c_1284,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_453,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_1285,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1284,c_456]) ).

tcf(c_1291,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_453,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_1292,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1291,c_456]) ).

tcf(c_1680,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2)
      | apart_point_and_line(sK1,X0)
      | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_454,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1733,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK1,iPr_def_10)
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1680,c_457]) ).

tcf(c_1734,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,sK2),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1733,c_1292]) ).

tcf(c_1736,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,X0)
      | distinct_lines(sK2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1734,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_1752,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1736,c_457]) ).

tcf(c_1753,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1752,c_1285]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : GEO174+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:14:54 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.41  % Proving...
% 2.45/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.45/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.45/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % 
% 2.45/1.27  % clauses                               33
% 2.45/1.27  % conjectures                           4
% 2.45/1.27  % EPR                                   24
% 2.45/1.27  % Horn                                  16
% 2.45/1.27  % unary                                 11
% 2.45/1.27  % binary                                7
% 2.45/1.27  % lits                                  81
% 2.45/1.27  % lits eq                               1
% 2.45/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.45/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.45/1.27  % fd_cond                               0
% 2.45/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 2.45/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ 
% 2.45/1.27  % Current options:
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 2.45/1.27  % 
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.45/1.27  
% 2.45/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------