↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO175+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 11.71s 11.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO175+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 07:45:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.56  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 11.71/11.75  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.75  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 11.71/11.75  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 11.71/11.75  % Transform   :cnf
% 11.71/11.75  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 11.71/11.75  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 11.71/11.76  
% 11.71/11.76  % Result      :Theorem 11.150000s
% 11.71/11.76  % Output      :CNFRefutation 11.150000s
% 11.71/11.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.76  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.76  % File     : GEO175+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 11.71/11.76  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 11.71/11.76  % Problem  : Lemma on symmetry and apartness
% 11.71/11.76  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 11.71/11.76  % English  : If two lines are convergent and a point is distinct from the
% 11.71/11.76  %            intersection point then this point is apart from at least one of
% 11.71/11.76  %            these lines.
% 11.71/11.76  
% 11.71/11.76  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 11.71/11.76  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 11.71/11.76  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 11.71/11.76  % Names    : Lemma 4.1.ii [vPl95]
% 11.71/11.76  
% 11.71/11.76  % Status   : Theorem
% 11.71/11.76  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.17 v5.3.0, 0.26 v5.2.0, 0.14 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 11.71/11.76  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Number of connectives :   32 (   7   ~;  10   |;   3   &)
% 11.71/11.76  %                                         (   0 <=>;  12  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 11.71/11.76  %            Number of variables   :   37 (  37   !;   0   ?)
% 11.71/11.76  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 11.71/11.76  
% 11.71/11.76  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 11.71/11.76  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.76  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 11.71/11.76  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.76  fof(con,conjecture,
% 11.71/11.76      ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 11.71/11.76        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 11.71/11.76          & convergent_lines(U,V)
% 11.71/11.76          & distinct_points(X,intersection_point(U,V)) )
% 11.71/11.76       => ( apart_point_and_line(X,U)
% 11.71/11.76          | apart_point_and_line(X,V) ) ) ).
% 11.71/11.76  
% 11.71/11.76  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.71/11.76  % Proof found
% 11.71/11.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.71/11.76  % SZS output start Proof
% 11.71/11.76  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 11.71/11.76  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 11.71/11.76  %MaxLitNum:6
% 11.71/11.76  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 11.71/11.76  %SharedTerms:10
% 11.71/11.76  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5
% 11.71/11.76  %singleGoalClaCount:5
% 11.71/11.76  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 11.71/11.76  [2]P2(a3,a4)
% 11.71/11.76  [4]~P3(a1,a3)
% 11.71/11.76  [5]~P3(a1,a4)
% 11.71/11.76  [3]P1(a1,f5(a3,a4))
% 11.71/11.76  [6]~P1(x61,x61)
% 11.71/11.76  [7]~P4(x71,x71)
% 11.71/11.76  [8]~P2(x81,x81)
% 11.71/11.76  [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P3(x152,f6(x151,x152))
% 11.71/11.76  [16]~P1(x161,x162)+~P3(x161,f6(x161,x162))
% 11.71/11.76  [17]~P2(x171,x172)+~P3(f5(x171,x172),x172)
% 11.71/11.76  [18]~P2(x181,x182)+~P3(f5(x181,x182),x181)
% 11.71/11.76  [9]~P1(x93,x91)+P1(x91,x92)+P1(x93,x92)
% 11.71/11.76  [10]~P3(x101,x103)+P1(x101,x102)+P3(x102,x103)
% 11.71/11.76  [11]~P4(x113,x111)+P4(x111,x112)+P4(x113,x112)
% 11.71/11.76  [12]~P2(x123,x121)+P4(x121,x122)+P2(x123,x122)
% 11.71/11.76  [13]~P3(x133,x131)+P4(x131,x132)+P3(x133,x132)
% 11.71/11.76  [14]~P2(x143,x141)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x143,x142)
% 11.71/11.76  [19]P3(x194,x193)+~P1(x194,x191)+~P4(x193,x192)+P3(x191,x192)+P3(x191,x193)+P3(x194,x192)
% 11.71/11.76  %EqnAxiom
% 11.71/11.76  
% 11.71/11.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.74/11.77  cnf(23,plain,
% 11.74/11.77     (P4(a4,a3)),
% 11.74/11.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,6,8,9,12])).
% 11.74/11.77  cnf(34,plain,
% 11.74/11.77     (~P3(f5(a3,a4),a4)),
% 11.74/11.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7,17,12])).
% 11.74/11.77  cnf(44,plain,
% 11.74/11.77     (~P3(f5(a3,a4),a3)),
% 11.74/11.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7,18,13])).
% 11.74/11.77  cnf(406,plain,
% 11.74/11.77     ($false),
% 11.74/11.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,5,3,23,34,44,19]),
% 11.74/11.77     ['proof']).
% 11.74/11.77  % SZS output end Proof
% 11.74/11.77  % Total time :11.150000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------