%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO176+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.10s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 12 ~; 13 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X4) )
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& distinct_points(X1,X2) )
=> distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X4,X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(con2,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( convergent_lines(X1,X2)
=> ( ( apart_point_and_line(X3,X2)
| apart_point_and_line(X3,X1) )
=> distinct_points(X3,intersection_point(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con2) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
( ( ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X5)
| apart_point_and_line(X1,X4) )
& convergent_lines(X4,X5)
& distinct_points(X1,X2) )
=> distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X4,X5)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_points(esk1_0,intersection_point(esk3_0,esk4_0))
& ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk4_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
& convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
& distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23] :
( ( ~ convergent_lines(X21,X22)
| distinct_points(X23,intersection_point(X21,X22))
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X23,X22) )
& ( ~ convergent_lines(X21,X22)
| distinct_points(X23,intersection_point(X21,X22))
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X23,X21) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_points(esk1_0,intersection_point(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ convergent_lines(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X3,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk4_0)
| apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk4_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ convergent_lines(X2,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
| distinct_points(X1,intersection_point(X2,X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO176+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 13:02:58 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % new_bool_3 with pid 702601 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.48 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 702607 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.48 % Search class: FGUNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.48
% 0.10/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.10/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1
% 0.10/0.48 % Initial clauses : 16
% 0.10/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.10/0.48 % Processed clauses : 33
% 0.10/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.10/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 30
% 0.10/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.10/0.48 % Generated clauses : 47
% 0.10/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.10/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Paramodulations : 44
% 0.10/0.48 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.10/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.10/0.48 % ...of those cached : 10
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 0.10/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.10/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.10/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 17
% 0.10/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.10/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 64
% 0.10/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.10/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18
% 0.10/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15
% 0.10/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.10/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.10/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.10/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.10/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1551
% 0.10/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 219
% 0.10/0.48
% 0.10/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.48 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.48 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.48 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.10/0.48
% 0.10/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.48 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.10/0.48 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.10/0.48 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.10/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------