%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : GEO176+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:21:17 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 1.52s 1.73s
% Output : Refutation 1.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : GEO176+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 9 08:01:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 1.52/1.73 % Version: 1.5
% 1.52/1.73 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.52/1.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 1.52/1.73 fof(con,conjecture,(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)))=>distinct_points(X,intersection_point(U,V))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)))=>distinct_points(X,intersection_point(U,V)))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:(?[Y]:(?[U]:(?[V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(X,V)))&~distinct_points(X,intersection_point(U,V))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:(?[X5]:(((distinct_points(X2,X3)&convergent_lines(X4,X5))&(apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X2,X5)))&~distinct_points(X2,intersection_point(X4,X5))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(((distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002)&convergent_lines(skolem0003,skolem0004))&(apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0004)))&~distinct_points(skolem0001,intersection_point(skolem0003,skolem0004))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c2])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c7,negated_conjecture,~distinct_points(skolem0001,intersection_point(skolem0003,skolem0004)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c5,negated_conjecture,convergent_lines(skolem0003,skolem0004),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(con2,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:(convergent_lines(X,Y)=>((apart_point_and_line(Z,X)|apart_point_and_line(Z,Y))=>distinct_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax', con2)).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c24,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:(~convergent_lines(X,Y)|((~apart_point_and_line(Z,X)&~apart_point_and_line(Z,Y))|distinct_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con2])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c25,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(~convergent_lines(X,Y)|(![Z]:((~apart_point_and_line(Z,X)&~apart_point_and_line(Z,Y))|distinct_points(Z,intersection_point(X,Y))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c24])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c27,plain,(![X18]:(![X19]:(![X20]:(~convergent_lines(X18,X19)|((~apart_point_and_line(X20,X18)&~apart_point_and_line(X20,X19))|distinct_points(X20,intersection_point(X18,X19))))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c26,plain,(![X18]:(![X19]:(~convergent_lines(X18,X19)|(![X20]:((~apart_point_and_line(X20,X18)&~apart_point_and_line(X20,X19))|distinct_points(X20,intersection_point(X18,X19))))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c25])).])).
% 1.52/1.73 fof(c28,plain,(![X18]:(![X19]:(![X20]:((~convergent_lines(X18,X19)|(~apart_point_and_line(X20,X18)|distinct_points(X20,intersection_point(X18,X19))))&(~convergent_lines(X18,X19)|(~apart_point_and_line(X20,X19)|distinct_points(X20,intersection_point(X18,X19)))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[c27])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c30,plain,~convergent_lines(X61,X62)|~apart_point_and_line(X60,X62)|distinct_points(X60,intersection_point(X61,X62)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0004),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c29,plain,~convergent_lines(X56,X57)|~apart_point_and_line(X55,X56)|distinct_points(X55,intersection_point(X56,X57)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c28])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c79,plain,~convergent_lines(skolem0003,X108)|distinct_points(skolem0001,intersection_point(skolem0003,X108))|apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0004),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c29, c6])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c244,plain,distinct_points(skolem0001,intersection_point(skolem0003,skolem0004))|apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0004),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c79, c5])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c3836,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0004),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c244, c7])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c3842,plain,~convergent_lines(X721,skolem0004)|distinct_points(skolem0001,intersection_point(X721,skolem0004)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3836, c30])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c3942,plain,distinct_points(skolem0001,intersection_point(skolem0003,skolem0004)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3842, c5])).
% 1.52/1.73 cnf(c4010,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c3942, c7])).
% 1.52/1.73 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 1.52/1.73
% 1.52/1.73 % Initial clauses : 18
% 1.52/1.73 % Processed clauses : 173
% 1.52/1.73 % Factors computed : 118
% 1.52/1.73 % Resolvents computed: 3831
% 1.52/1.73 % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 1.52/1.73 % Forward subsumed : 403
% 1.52/1.73 % Backward subsumed : 36
% 1.52/1.73 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 1.52/1.73 % User time : 1.328 s
% 1.52/1.73 % System time : 0.021 s
% 1.52/1.73 % Total time : 1.349 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------