↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO177+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:12 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 11.37s 11.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : GEO177+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 07:25:54 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.55  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 11.37/11.43  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.43  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 11.37/11.43  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 11.37/11.43  % Transform   :cnf
% 11.37/11.43  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 11.37/11.43  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 11.37/11.43  
% 11.37/11.43  % Result      :Theorem 10.830000s
% 11.37/11.43  % Output      :CNFRefutation 10.830000s
% 11.37/11.43  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.44  % File     : GEO177+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 11.37/11.44  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 11.37/11.44  % Problem  : Symmetry of apartness
% 11.37/11.44  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms : Especial.
% 11.37/11.44  % English  : If the points X and Y are distinct and U and V are distinct,
% 11.37/11.44  %            and X or Y is apart from the line connecting U and V, then
% 11.37/11.44  %            U or V are apart from the line connecting X and Y.
% 11.37/11.44  
% 11.37/11.44  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 11.37/11.44  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 11.37/11.44  % Source   : [ILTP]
% 11.37/11.44  % Names    : Theorem 4.2 [vPl95]
% 11.37/11.44  
% 11.37/11.44  % Status   : Theorem
% 11.37/11.44  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.3.0, 0.14 v7.2.0, 0.17 v7.1.0, 0.25 v7.0.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.25 v5.4.0, 0.26 v5.3.0, 0.35 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.26 v4.0.0, 0.25 v3.7.0, 0.14 v3.5.0, 0.00 v3.3.0
% 11.37/11.44  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   3 unt;   0 def)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Number of connectives :   33 (   7   ~;  11   |;   2   &)
% 11.37/11.44  %                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   4 usr;   0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 11.37/11.44  %            Number of variables   :   37 (  37   !;   0   ?)
% 11.37/11.44  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 11.37/11.44  
% 11.37/11.44  % Comments : Definitions unfolded, hence Especial.
% 11.37/11.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.44  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 11.37/11.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.44  fof(con,conjecture,
% 11.37/11.44      ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 11.37/11.44        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 11.37/11.44          & distinct_points(U,V) )
% 11.37/11.44       => ( ( apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(U,V))
% 11.37/11.44            | apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(U,V)) )
% 11.37/11.44         => ( apart_point_and_line(U,line_connecting(X,Y))
% 11.37/11.44            | apart_point_and_line(V,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ) ) ).
% 11.37/11.44  
% 11.37/11.44  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.44  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.44  % Proof found
% 11.37/11.44  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 11.37/11.44  % SZS output start Proof
% 11.37/11.44  %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0)
% 11.37/11.44  %VarNum:74(SingletonVarNum:33)
% 11.37/11.44  %MaxLitNum:6
% 11.37/11.44  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 11.37/11.44  %SharedTerms:12
% 11.37/11.44  %goalClause: 1 2 6 7 14
% 11.37/11.44  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 11.37/11.44  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 11.37/11.44  [2]P1(a3,a4)
% 11.37/11.44  [6]~P4(a3,f5(a1,a2))
% 11.37/11.44  [7]~P4(a4,f5(a1,a2))
% 11.37/11.44  [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 11.37/11.44  [4]~P2(x41,x41)
% 11.37/11.44  [5]~P3(x51,x51)
% 11.37/11.44  [14]P4(a2,f5(a3,a4))+P4(a1,f5(a3,a4))
% 11.37/11.44  [15]~P1(x151,x152)+~P4(x152,f5(x151,x152))
% 11.37/11.44  [16]~P1(x161,x162)+~P4(x161,f5(x161,x162))
% 11.37/11.44  [17]~P3(x171,x172)+~P4(f6(x171,x172),x172)
% 11.37/11.44  [18]~P3(x181,x182)+~P4(f6(x181,x182),x181)
% 11.37/11.44  [8]~P1(x83,x81)+P1(x81,x82)+P1(x83,x82)
% 11.37/11.44  [9]~P4(x91,x93)+P1(x91,x92)+P4(x92,x93)
% 11.37/11.44  [10]~P2(x103,x101)+P2(x101,x102)+P2(x103,x102)
% 11.37/11.44  [11]~P3(x113,x111)+P2(x111,x112)+P3(x113,x112)
% 11.37/11.44  [12]~P4(x123,x121)+P2(x121,x122)+P4(x123,x122)
% 11.37/11.44  [13]~P3(x133,x131)+P3(x131,x132)+P3(x133,x132)
% 11.37/11.44  [19]P4(x194,x193)+~P1(x194,x191)+~P2(x193,x192)+P4(x191,x192)+P4(x191,x193)+P4(x194,x192)
% 11.37/11.44  %EqnAxiom
% 11.37/11.44  
% 11.37/11.44  %-------------------------------------------
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(20,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (P1(a2,a1)),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,3,8])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(23,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a3,f5(a4,a3))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,15,8])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(24,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a4,f5(a4,a3))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,16,8])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(27,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a2,f5(a1,a2))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,9,15])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(28,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a1,f5(a1,a2))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,1,12,16])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(29,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a4,f5(a3,a4))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,15,9])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(32,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a2,f5(a2,a1))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,4,16,12])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(34,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a3,f5(a3,a4))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,16,12])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(39,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P4(a1,f5(a2,a1))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,3,8,15])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(72,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (P1(a4,a3)),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,8])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(334,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (P2(f5(a3,a4),f5(a1,a2))+P4(a1,f5(a3,a4))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[27,14,12])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(375,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (P2(f5(a3,a4),f5(a1,a2))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[28,334,12])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(376,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (P2(f5(a1,a2),f5(a3,a4))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[375,4,10])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(453,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P2(f5(a1,a2),f5(a4,a3))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,7,2,23,24,19])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(455,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P3(f5(a4,a3),f5(a1,a2))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[453,5,11])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(458,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (P2(f5(a3,a4),f5(a4,a3))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[453,376,5,11,10])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(460,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     (~P2(f5(a2,a1),f5(a1,a2))),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[453,20,27,32,39,28,376,5,11,10,19])).
% 11.37/11.45  cnf(475,plain,
% 11.37/11.45     ($false),
% 11.37/11.45     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,7,460,72,29,34,458,455,376,4,5,13,12,11,10,19]),
% 11.37/11.45     ['proof']).
% 11.37/11.45  % SZS output end Proof
% 11.37/11.45  % Total time :10.830000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------