↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : GEO177+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 06:04:12 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.58s 0.89s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GEO177+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Fri Jun 21 08:07:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.46/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.88  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.88  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 0.58/0.88  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.88  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.58/0.88  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.58/0.88  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.58/0.88  
% 0.58/0.88  % Result      :Theorem 0.250000s
% 0.58/0.88  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.250000s
% 0.58/0.88  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.88  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.88  % File     : GEO177+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.58/0.88  % Domain   : Geometry (Constructive)
% 0.58/0.88  % Problem  : Symmetry of apartness
% 0.58/0.88  % Version  : [vPl95] axioms.
% 0.58/0.88  % English  : If the points X and Y are distinct and U and V are distinct,
% 0.58/0.88  %            and X or Y is apart from the line connecting U and V, then
% 0.58/0.88  %            U or V are apart from the line connecting X and Y.
% 0.58/0.88  
% 0.58/0.88  % Refs     : [vPl95] von Plato (1995), The Axioms of Constructive Geometry
% 0.58/0.88  %          : [ROK06] Raths et al. (2006), The ILTP Problem Library for Intu
% 0.58/0.88  %          : [Rat07] Raths (2007), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.58/0.88  % Source   : [Rat07]
% 0.58/0.88  % Names    : Theorem 4.2 [vPl95]
% 0.58/0.88  
% 0.58/0.88  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.58/0.88  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.3.0, 0.26 v5.2.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.15 v4.1.0, 0.17 v4.0.1, 0.16 v4.0.0
% 0.58/0.88  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (   7 unt;   0 def)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Number of atoms       :   99 (   0 equ)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Number of connectives :   91 (  28   ~;  21   |;  14   &)
% 0.58/0.88  %                                         (   5 <=>;  23  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Number of predicates  :   12 (  12 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.58/0.88  %            Number of variables   :   85 (  85   !;   0   ?)
% 0.58/0.88  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.58/0.88  
% 0.58/0.88  % Comments :
% 0.58/0.88  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.88  include('Axioms/GEO006+0.ax').
% 0.58/0.88  include('Axioms/GEO006+1.ax').
% 0.58/0.89  include('Axioms/GEO006+2.ax').
% 0.58/0.89  include('Axioms/GEO006+3.ax').
% 0.58/0.89  include('Axioms/GEO006+4.ax').
% 0.58/0.89  include('Axioms/GEO006+5.ax').
% 0.58/0.89  include('Axioms/GEO006+6.ax').
% 0.58/0.89  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.89  fof(con,conjecture,
% 0.58/0.89      ! [X,Y,U,V] :
% 0.58/0.89        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
% 0.58/0.89          & distinct_points(U,V) )
% 0.58/0.89       => ( ( apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(U,V))
% 0.58/0.89            | apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(U,V)) )
% 0.58/0.89         => ( apart_point_and_line(U,line_connecting(X,Y))
% 0.58/0.89            | apart_point_and_line(V,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ) ) ).
% 0.58/0.89  
% 0.58/0.89  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.89  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.89  % Proof found
% 0.58/0.89  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.89  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.58/0.89  %ClaNum:51(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.58/0.89  %VarNum:218(SingletonVarNum:98)
% 0.58/0.89  %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.58/0.89  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.58/0.89  %SharedTerms:12
% 0.58/0.89  %goalClause: 1 2 6 7 34
% 0.58/0.89  %singleGoalClaCount:4
% 0.58/0.89  [1]P1(a1,a2)
% 0.58/0.89  [2]P1(a3,a4)
% 0.58/0.89  [6]~P4(a3,f5(a1,a2))
% 0.58/0.89  [7]~P4(a4,f5(a1,a2))
% 0.58/0.89  [3]~P1(x31,x31)
% 0.58/0.89  [4]~P2(x41,x41)
% 0.58/0.89  [5]~P3(x51,x51)
% 0.58/0.89  [8]~P4(x81,f7(x82,x81))
% 0.58/0.89  [9]~P4(x91,f8(x92,x91))
% 0.58/0.89  [10]~P3(f7(x101,x102),x101)
% 0.58/0.89  [11]~P5(f8(x111,x112),x111)
% 0.58/0.89  [34]P4(a2,f5(a3,a4))+P4(a1,f5(a3,a4))
% 0.58/0.89  [12]P6(x121,x122)+P1(x121,x122)
% 0.58/0.89  [13]P7(x131,x132)+P2(x131,x132)
% 0.58/0.89  [15]P5(x151,x152)+P3(x151,x152)
% 0.58/0.89  [16]P8(x161,x162)+P3(x161,x162)
% 0.58/0.89  [17]P9(x171,x172)+P4(x171,x172)
% 0.58/0.89  [18]P10(x181,x182)+P5(x181,x182)
% 0.58/0.89  [19]~P2(x191,x192)+P3(x191,x192)
% 0.58/0.89  [22]~P6(x221,x222)+~P1(x221,x222)
% 0.58/0.89  [23]~P7(x231,x232)+~P2(x231,x232)
% 0.58/0.89  [24]~P8(x241,x242)+~P3(x241,x242)
% 0.58/0.89  [25]~P9(x251,x252)+~P4(x251,x252)
% 0.58/0.89  [26]~P10(x261,x262)+~P5(x261,x262)
% 0.58/0.89  [47]~P1(x471,x472)+~P4(x472,f5(x471,x472))
% 0.58/0.89  [48]~P1(x481,x482)+~P4(x481,f5(x481,x482))
% 0.58/0.89  [49]~P3(x491,x492)+~P4(f6(x491,x492),x492)
% 0.58/0.89  [50]~P3(x501,x502)+~P4(f6(x501,x502),x501)
% 0.58/0.89  [20]~P12(x202)+~P11(x201)+P11(f7(x201,x202))
% 0.58/0.89  [21]~P12(x212)+~P11(x211)+P11(f8(x211,x212))
% 0.58/0.89  [27]~P1(x273,x271)+P1(x271,x272)+P1(x273,x272)
% 0.58/0.89  [28]~P4(x281,x283)+P1(x281,x282)+P4(x282,x283)
% 0.58/0.89  [29]~P2(x293,x291)+P2(x291,x292)+P2(x293,x292)
% 0.58/0.89  [30]~P3(x303,x301)+P2(x301,x302)+P3(x303,x302)
% 0.58/0.89  [31]~P4(x313,x311)+P2(x311,x312)+P4(x313,x312)
% 0.58/0.89  [32]~P3(x323,x321)+P3(x321,x322)+P3(x323,x322)
% 0.58/0.89  [33]~P3(x333,x332)+P5(x331,x332)+P5(x331,x333)
% 0.58/0.89  [36]~P11(x362)+~P11(x361)+~P3(x361,x362)+P12(f6(x361,x362))
% 0.58/0.89  [37]~P12(x372)+~P12(x371)+~P1(x371,x372)+P11(f5(x371,x372))
% 0.58/0.89  [39]~P3(x391,x393)+~P5(x391,x393)+P3(x391,x392)+P5(x393,x392)
% 0.58/0.89  [40]~P3(x402,x403)+~P5(x402,x403)+P3(x401,x402)+P3(x401,x403)
% 0.58/0.89  [41]~P3(x412,x413)+~P5(x412,x413)+P3(x411,x412)+P5(x411,x413)
% 0.58/0.89  [42]~P3(x423,x421)+~P5(x423,x421)+P3(x421,x422)+P5(x423,x422)
% 0.58/0.89  [43]~P3(x433,x432)+~P5(x433,x432)+P3(x431,x432)+P5(x431,x433)
% 0.58/0.89  [44]~P3(x441,x443)+~P5(x441,x443)+P5(x441,x442)+P5(x443,x442)
% 0.58/0.89  [46]P5(x463,x464)+~P2(x463,x462)+P4(x461,x462)+P4(x461,x463)+P5(x462,x464)
% 0.58/0.89  [51]P4(x514,x513)+~P1(x514,x511)+~P2(x513,x512)+P4(x511,x512)+P4(x511,x513)+P4(x514,x512)
% 0.58/0.89  %EqnAxiom
% 0.58/0.89  
% 0.58/0.89  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(52,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (~P6(a1,a2)),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,22])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(60,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (~P2(f7(x601,x602),x601)),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7,3,4,10,22,12,17,13,19])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(85,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (~P6(a3,a4)),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,2,60,10,13,17,16,22])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(94,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (~P2(x941,f7(x941,x942))),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,2,60,10,5,13,17,16,22,15,32,26,19])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(149,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (~P4(a2,f5(a1,a2))),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[52,47,12])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(168,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (~P4(a3,f5(a3,a4))),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[85,48,12])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(282,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (P4(a2,f5(a3,a4))),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[8,94,34,31])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(293,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     (P2(f5(a1,a2),f5(a3,a4))),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[282,149,168,4,25,28,31,23,22,29])).
% 0.58/0.89  cnf(301,plain,
% 0.58/0.89     ($false),
% 0.58/0.89     inference(scs_inference,[],[282,8,94,293,23,31]),
% 0.58/0.89     ['proof']).
% 0.58/0.89  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.58/0.89  % Total time :0.250000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------