↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : GEO177+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:17:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.05s 0.33s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   62 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  19   ~;  19   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   8 sgn  21   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(apart2,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ distinct_lines(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',apart2) ).

fof(apart5,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( distinct_lines(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_lines(Y,Z)
        | distinct_lines(X,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',apart5) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X,Z)
        | distinct_lines(Y,Z) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ceq2) ).

fof(p1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_lines(X,Y)
     => convergent_lines(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',p1) ).

fof(cp1,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(Y,X),Y),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cp1) ).

fof(cp2,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ~ apart_point_and_line(X,parallel_through_point(Y,X)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cp2) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ( distinct_points(U,V)
        & distinct_points(X,Y) )
     => ( ( apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(U,V))
          | apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(U,V)) )
       => ( apart_point_and_line(V,line_connecting(X,Y))
          | apart_point_and_line(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(con_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,U,V] :
        ( ( distinct_points(U,V)
          & distinct_points(X,Y) )
       => ( ( apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(U,V))
            | apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(U,V)) )
         => ( apart_point_and_line(V,line_connecting(X,Y))
            | apart_point_and_line(U,line_connecting(X,Y)) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(nnf_36,plain,
    ? [X,Y,U,V] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(V,line_connecting(X,Y))
      & ~ apart_point_and_line(U,line_connecting(X,Y))
      & ( apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(U,V))
        | apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(U,V)) )
      & distinct_points(U,V)
      & distinct_points(X,Y) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con_neg]) ).

fof(sk_con_neg,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK3))
    & ~ apart_point_and_line(sK1,line_connecting(sK0,sK3))
    & ( apart_point_and_line(sK3,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
      | apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2)) )
    & distinct_points(sK1,sK2)
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK3,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK3),skolemize(U,sK1),skolemize(V,sK2)],[nnf_36]) ).

cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK3,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
    | apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_con_neg]) ).

cnf(c_69,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,A)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cp2]) ).

cnf(c_70,plain,
    ~ convergent_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cp1]) ).

cnf(c_71,plain,
    ( convergent_lines(A,B)
    | ~ distinct_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[p1]) ).

cnf(c_73,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,C)
    | distinct_lines(B,C)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ceq2]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(B,C)
    | distinct_lines(A,C)
    | ~ distinct_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[apart5]) ).

cnf(c_84,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[apart2]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(parallel_through_point(A,B),A),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_70]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
    | apart_point_and_line(sK3,A)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(sK1,sK2),A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_49]) ).

cnf(c_180,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(B,A)
    | ~ distinct_lines(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_81,c_84]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    ~ distinct_lines(A,parallel_through_point(A,B)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_180,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_175,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2))
    | apart_point_and_line(sK3,parallel_through_point(line_connecting(sK1,sK2),A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_110,c_90]) ).

cnf(c_181,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(A,parallel_through_point(B,C))
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_178,plain,
    ~ apart_point_and_line(A,B),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_181,c_69]) ).

cnf(c_182,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK0,line_connecting(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_178,c_175]) ).

cnf(c_179,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_178,c_182]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : GEO177+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.05/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.05/0.31  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:01:35 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.05/0.32  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.05/0.32  % Process 2155972 was started by sandbox2 on n012,
% 0.05/0.32  % Fri Sep 25 13:01:35 2026
% 0.05/0.32  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.05/0.32  
% 0.05/0.32  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.05/0.33  
% 0.05/0.33  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.05/0.33  
% 0.05/0.33  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.05/0.33  % Length of proof is 20.
% 0.05/0.33  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.05/0.33  % Maximum clause weight is 27.000.
% 0.05/0.33  % Given clauses 56.
% 0.05/0.33  
% 0.05/0.33  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------