↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : GEO178+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 06:14:02 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.70s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   33 (  15   ~;  12   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (  22   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ distinct_points > distinct_lines > convergent_lines > apart_point_and_line > line_connecting > intersection_point > #nlpp > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(line_connecting,type,
    line_connecting: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(distinct_points,type,
    distinct_points: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(intersection_point,type,
    intersection_point: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(apart_point_and_line,type,
    apart_point_and_line: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(convergent_lines,type,
    convergent_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(distinct_lines,type,
    distinct_lines: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_142,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X,Y)
          & apart_point_and_line(Z,line_connecting(X,Y)) )
       => ( distinct_points(Z,X)
          & distinct_points(Z,Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

tff(f_119,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X,Y)
     => ( distinct_points(X,Z)
        | apart_point_and_line(Z,Y) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq1) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

tff(f_89,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( distinct_points(X,Y)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2')
    | ~ distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_1') ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_142]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_1'),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_142]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    apart_point_and_line('#skF_3',line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_142]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ! [Z_48,Y_49,X_50] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_48,Y_49)
      | distinct_points(X_50,Z_48)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_50,Y_49) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_119]) ).

tff(c_48,plain,
    ! [Z_51] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_51,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | distinct_points('#skF_3',Z_51) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_44]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [X_13,Y_14] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X_13,line_connecting(X_13,Y_14))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_13,Y_14) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2')
    | distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_1') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_48,c_14]) ).

tff(c_74,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_1'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_62]) ).

tff(c_76,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_74]) ).

tff(c_77,plain,
    ~ distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_30]) ).

tff(c_195,plain,
    ! [Z_81,Y_82,X_83] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_81,Y_82)
      | distinct_points(X_83,Z_81)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X_83,Y_82) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_119]) ).

tff(c_199,plain,
    ! [Z_84] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(Z_84,line_connecting('#skF_1','#skF_2'))
      | distinct_points('#skF_3',Z_84) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_195]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [Y_16,X_15] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(Y_16,line_connecting(X_15,Y_16))
      | ~ distinct_points(X_15,Y_16) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_89]) ).

tff(c_219,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points('#skF_1','#skF_2')
    | distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_199,c_16]) ).

tff(c_229,plain,
    distinct_points('#skF_3','#skF_2'),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_219]) ).

tff(c_231,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_77,c_229]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : GEO178+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Apr  7 19:54:36 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.70/1.99  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/2.00  
% 3.70/2.00  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------