%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : GEO178+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:27:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 14 ~; 10 |; 8 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& distinct_points(X1,X2) )
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X2)
& distinct_points(X3,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).
fof(con1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( distinct_points(X1,X2)
=> ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X2)
& distinct_points(X3,X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2))
& distinct_points(X1,X2) )
=> ( distinct_points(X3,X2)
& distinct_points(X3,X1) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X13,X14,X15] :
( ( ~ distinct_points(X13,X14)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X15,line_connecting(X13,X14))
| distinct_points(X15,X14) )
& ( ~ distinct_points(X13,X14)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X15,line_connecting(X13,X14))
| distinct_points(X15,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[con1])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0) )
& apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
& distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X3,X2)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X3,X2))
| distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0)
| ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ distinct_points(X2,X3)
| ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X3))
| distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : GEO178+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 13:06:26 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % sh5l with pid 707740 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.29/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.29/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.29/0.48 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 707741 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.29/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.29/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.29/0.48 % Search class: FGHNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.29/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.29/0.48
% 0.29/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.29/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 13
% 0.29/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Initial clauses : 17
% 0.29/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.29/0.48 % Processed clauses : 44
% 0.29/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % ...subsumed : 10
% 0.29/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.29/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.29/0.48 % Generated clauses : 78
% 0.29/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 52
% 0.29/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Paramodulations : 60
% 0.29/0.48 % Factorizations : 18
% 0.29/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 30
% 0.29/0.48 % ...of those cached : 25
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 32
% 0.29/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.29/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.29/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 23
% 0.29/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.29/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 87
% 0.29/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.29/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 112
% 0.29/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 76
% 0.29/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 0.29/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.29/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.29/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.29/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1869
% 0.29/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 217
% 0.29/0.48
% 0.29/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.48 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.29/0.48 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.29/0.48 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.29/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 0.29/0.48
% 0.29/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.48 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.29/0.48 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.29/0.48 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.29/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.29/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------