↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : GEO178+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:20:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.74s 1.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  12 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   99 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   93 (  39   ~;  36   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0 sgn  49   !;   6   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',apart1) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
       => ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
          & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',con1) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
     => ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
        | distinct_points(X0,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO008+0.ax',ceq1) ).

fof(f13,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
        & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
     => ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
        & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(f14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
          & distinct_points(X0,X1) )
       => ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
          & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f13]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
        & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | ( distinct_points(X2,X1)
        & distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f21]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & ( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
        | ~ distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      & distinct_points(X0,X1)
      & ( ~ distinct_points(X2,X1)
        | ~ distinct_points(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1))
    & distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    & ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
      | ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f33]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X0,X1))
      | distinct_points(X2,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1)
      | apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f50,plain,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f51,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ distinct_points(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

tcf(c_55,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X1)
      | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X2,X1)
      | distinct_points(X0,X2)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

tcf(c_68,plain,
    ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK0),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_213,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = line_connecting(sK0,sK1),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_214,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(sK2,iPr_def_10),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_213]) ).

tcf(c_215,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(sK0,sK1),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

tcf(c_477,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X0,iPr_def_10)
      | distinct_points(sK2,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_214,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_480,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10)
    | distinct_points(sK2,sK0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_477]) ).

tcf(c_497,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,sK0)
      | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_213,c_55]) ).

tcf(c_498,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,sK0)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_497,c_215]) ).

tcf(c_501,plain,
    ( distinct_points(sK0,sK0)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(sK0,iPr_def_10) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_498]) ).

tcf(c_606,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( distinct_points(X0,sK1)
      | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X0,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_56]) ).

tcf(c_875,plain,
    ( distinct_points(sK2,sK1)
    | ~ distinct_points(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(sK2,line_connecting(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_606]) ).

tcf(c_876,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_875,c_501,c_480,c_63,c_65,c_68,c_64]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO178+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 11:18:27 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.42  
% 0.10/0.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.10/0.43  % Proving...
% 1.74/1.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.74/1.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.74/1.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % 
% 1.74/1.28  % clauses                               13
% 1.74/1.28  % conjectures                           3
% 1.74/1.28  % EPR                                   10
% 1.74/1.28  % Horn                                  8
% 1.74/1.28  % unary                                 5
% 1.74/1.28  % binary                                1
% 1.74/1.28  % lits                                  31
% 1.74/1.28  % lits eq                               1
% 1.74/1.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.74/1.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.74/1.28  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.74/1.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.74/1.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.74/1.28  % Current options:
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % ------ Proving...
% 1.74/1.28  % 
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.74/1.28  
% 1.74/1.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------