↑ Up

LisaST---0.9.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : LisaST---0.9
% Problem  : GEO178+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:14:33 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.44s 6.96s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   36 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  13   ~;   9   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ci1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X1)
     => ~ 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X0,'line$uconnecting'(X0,X1)) ) ).

fof(ci2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X1)
     => ~ 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X1,'line$uconnecting'(X0,X1)) ) ).

fof(ceq1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X0,X1)
     => ( 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X2,X1)
        | 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X2) ) ) ).

fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X2,'line$uconnecting'(X0,X1))
        & 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X1) )
     => ( 'distinct$upoints'(X2,X1)
        & 'distinct$upoints'(X2,X0) ) ) ).

fof(negated_conjecture,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X2,'line$uconnecting'(X0,X1))
          & 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X1) )
       => ( 'distinct$upoints'(X2,X1)
          & 'distinct$upoints'(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(negate_conjecture,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

cnf(c6,plain,
    ( ~ 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X0,'line$uconnecting'(X0,X1))
    | ~ 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[ci1]) ).

cnf(c7,plain,
    ( ~ 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X1,'line$uconnecting'(X0,X1))
    | ~ 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[ci2]) ).

cnf(c11,plain,
    ( 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X2,X1)
    | 'distinct$upoints'(X0,X2)
    | ~ 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X0,X1) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[ceq1]) ).

cnf(c46,plain,
    'distinct$upoints'(sK81,sK82),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c47,plain,
    'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(sK83,'line$uconnecting'(sK81,sK82)),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(c48,plain,
    ( ~ 'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK82)
    | ~ 'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK81) ),
    inference(clausification,[status(esa)],[negated_conjecture]) ).

cnf(d0,plain,
    ( 'apart$upoint$uand$uline'(X0,'line$uconnecting'(sK81,sK82))
    | 'distinct$upoints'(sK83,X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c11,c47]) ).

cnf(d1,plain,
    ( ~ 'distinct$upoints'(sK81,sK82)
    | 'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK82) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d0,c7]) ).

cnf(d2,plain,
    'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK82),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c46,d1]) ).

cnf(d3,plain,
    ( ~ 'distinct$upoints'(sK81,sK82)
    | 'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK81) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d0,c6]) ).

cnf(d4,plain,
    'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK81),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c46,d3]) ).

cnf(d5,plain,
    ~ 'distinct$upoints'(sK83,sK82),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d4,c48]) ).

cnf(d6,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[d5,d2]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : GEO178+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 13:02:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running casc-portfolio.sh -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.44/6.96  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 12.44/6.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------