↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : GEO179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:04:20 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  21   ~;  21   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
     => ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X1))
        & distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',con) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(ceq1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_points(X1,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq1) ).

fof(ci1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(ci2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
          & apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
       => ( distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X1))
          & distinct_lines(line_connecting(X1,X2),line_connecting(X3,X2)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
      | distinct_lines(X5,X6)
      | apart_point_and_line(X4,X6) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    & ( ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0))
      | ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_lines(X3,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,X1)
    | distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,X5)
      | distinct_points(X4,X6)
      | apart_point_and_line(X6,X5) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq1])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0))
    | ~ distinct_lines(line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0),line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
    | distinct_points(X3,X1)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2))
    | ~ distinct_points(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | distinct_points(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X3,X4)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X4,line_connecting(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0))
    | ~ distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk3_0,esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X2,X1))
    | ~ distinct_points(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk3_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk3_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO179+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 15:33:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.22/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.22/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 27
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 16
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 15
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 12
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 8
% 0.22/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 8
% 0.22/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.22/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 15
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 15
% 0.22/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 0.22/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 29
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 28
% 0.22/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 43
% 0.22/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 38
% 0.22/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 41
% 0.22/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 25
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.22/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.22/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 0.22/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 74
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.22/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 44
% 0.22/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.22/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.22/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.22/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1585
% 0.22/1.41  
% 0.22/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/1.41  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.41  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.22/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 2820 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------