↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:19:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  23   ~;  15   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(con,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
      ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
        & convergent_lines(X4,X5)
        & ~ distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
     => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
        & ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',con) ).

fof(ceq2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( apart_point_and_line(X1,X2)
     => ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
        | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ceq2) ).

fof(ci1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci1) ).

fof(ci2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax',ci2) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X4,X5] :
        ( ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
          & convergent_lines(X4,X5)
          & ~ distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X1,X2)) )
       => ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X4)
          & ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,X4) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X70,X71,X72] :
      ( ~ apart_point_and_line(X70,X71)
      | distinct_lines(X71,X72)
      | apart_point_and_line(X70,X72) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & convergent_lines(esk3_0,esk4_0)
    & ~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    & ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( distinct_lines(X2,X3)
    | apart_point_and_line(X1,X3)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X55,X56] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X55,X56)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X55,line_connecting(X55,X56)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ distinct_lines(esk3_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    | apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,X1)
    | distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X1,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk1_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0))
    | apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    distinct_points(esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( distinct_points(X1,X2)
     => ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X57,X58] :
      ( ~ distinct_points(X57,X58)
      | ~ apart_point_and_line(X58,line_connecting(X57,X58)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,X1)
    | distinct_lines(esk3_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ distinct_points(X1,X2)
    | ~ apart_point_and_line(X2,line_connecting(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    apart_point_and_line(esk2_0,line_connecting(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GEO183+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 17:48:53 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.367s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------