↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:21:20 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.89s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO183+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu May  9 08:21:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/0.89  % Version:  1.5
% 0.71/0.89  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/0.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.71/0.89  fof(con,conjecture,(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y))))=>((~apart_point_and_line(X,U))&(~apart_point_and_line(Y,U)))))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&(~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y))))=>((~apart_point_and_line(X,U))&(~apart_point_and_line(Y,U))))))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(~(![X]:(![Y]:(![U]:(![V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)))=>(~apart_point_and_line(X,U)&~apart_point_and_line(Y,U)))))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:(?[Y]:(?[U]:(?[V]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&convergent_lines(U,V))&~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U))))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(?[X]:(?[Y]:(?[U]:(((distinct_points(X,Y)&(?[V]:convergent_lines(U,V)))&~distinct_lines(U,line_connecting(X,Y)))&(apart_point_and_line(X,U)|apart_point_and_line(Y,U)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c2])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(?[X2]:(?[X3]:(?[X4]:(((distinct_points(X2,X3)&(?[X5]:convergent_lines(X4,X5)))&~distinct_lines(X4,line_connecting(X2,X3)))&(apart_point_and_line(X2,X4)|apart_point_and_line(X3,X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c3])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c5,negated_conjecture,(((distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002)&convergent_lines(skolem0003,skolem0004))&~distinct_lines(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)))&(apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[c4])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(ci2,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>(~apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax', ci2)).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c36,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>~apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci2])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c37,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(~distinct_points(X,Y)|~apart_point_and_line(Y,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c36])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c38,plain,(![X23]:(![X24]:(~distinct_points(X23,X24)|~apart_point_and_line(X24,line_connecting(X23,X24))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c37])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c39,plain,~distinct_points(X46,X47)|~apart_point_and_line(X47,line_connecting(X46,X47)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c38])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c8,negated_conjecture,~distinct_lines(skolem0003,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(ceq2,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:(apart_point_and_line(X,Y)=>(distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax', ceq2)).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c15,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(![Z]:(~apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|(distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ceq2])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c16,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(~apart_point_and_line(X,Y)|(![Z]:(distinct_lines(Y,Z)|apart_point_and_line(X,Z)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c15])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c18,plain,(![X9]:(![X10]:(![X11]:(~apart_point_and_line(X9,X10)|(distinct_lines(X10,X11)|apart_point_and_line(X9,X11)))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c17,plain,(![X9]:(![X10]:(~apart_point_and_line(X9,X10)|(![X11]:(distinct_lines(X10,X11)|apart_point_and_line(X9,X11)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c16])).])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c19,plain,~apart_point_and_line(X54,X56)|distinct_lines(X56,X55)|apart_point_and_line(X54,X55),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c18])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(ci1,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>(~apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y)))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO006+0.ax', ci1)).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c40,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(distinct_points(X,Y)=>~apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ci1])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c41,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(~distinct_points(X,Y)|~apart_point_and_line(X,line_connecting(X,Y))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c40])).
% 0.71/0.89  fof(c42,plain,(![X25]:(![X26]:(~distinct_points(X25,X26)|~apart_point_and_line(X25,line_connecting(X25,X26))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c41])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c43,plain,~distinct_points(X49,X48)|~apart_point_and_line(X49,line_connecting(X49,X48)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c42])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c9,negated_conjecture,apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,skolem0003)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c5])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c72,plain,distinct_lines(skolem0003,X84)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,X84)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c19, c9])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c135,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0001,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002))|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c72, c8])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c715,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003)|~distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c135, c43])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c733,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,skolem0003),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c715, c6])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c742,plain,distinct_lines(skolem0003,X265)|apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,X265),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c733, c19])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c746,plain,apart_point_and_line(skolem0002,line_connecting(skolem0001,skolem0002)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c742, c8])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c768,plain,~distinct_points(skolem0001,skolem0002),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c746, c39])).
% 0.71/0.89  cnf(c770,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c768, c6])).
% 0.71/0.89  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.71/0.89  
% 0.71/0.89  % Initial clauses    : 18
% 0.71/0.89  % Processed clauses  : 95
% 0.71/0.89  % Factors computed   : 42
% 0.71/0.89  % Resolvents computed: 668
% 0.71/0.89  % Tautologies deleted: 0
% 0.71/0.89  % Forward subsumed   : 137
% 0.71/0.89  % Backward subsumed  : 9
% 0.71/0.89  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.71/0.89  % User time          : 0.491 s
% 0.71/0.89  % System time        : 0.022 s
% 0.71/0.89  % Total time         : 0.513 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------